Poll: Are Audiobooks Shameful?

Piorn

New member
Dec 26, 2007
1,097
0
0
When they're well done, they can add a lot to the book. Sure, it's a different experience, but I wouldn't say it's inferior or shameful.

I had a stack of audio cassettes of HP4, and the narrator did all the voices and stuff, it was really good. Different from reading it yourself, but good.
 

Zac Jovanovic

New member
Jan 5, 2012
253
0
0
I tried listening to an audiobook of 50 Shades of Grey while working once, was bored as hell and wanted to see what it was about. I suffered through it until the first sex scene, then went from annoying to really annoying then so I quit.

My only "real" audibook experience was Sanderson's "Elantris" from Audible. I couldn't get it shipped in for a reasonable price so I tried the audiobook, it just didn't work for me. 27 hours for a short fantasy novel is just ridiculous. A few months later I got my hands on the paperback and I read it in 3 pulls.

I always carry a book in my jacket's inner pocket, I read pretty much every chance I get and go through a book weekly usually. In the rare times I have to walk distances I listen to music, and while working I usually listen to music or standup comedy or some form of non physical humor. Audio books just don't work for me.

That being said, to call them shameful is stupid. If they work for you that's great.
 

Fdzzaigl

New member
Mar 31, 2010
822
0
0
I have absolutely no problem with people doing that, why would I?

Personally though, I can't stand audio books, tried them a few times but it just doesn't do it for me like a written book. I enjoy the peace while reading and imagining the dialogue and the scenario myself.
 

Feylynn

New member
Feb 16, 2010
559
0
0
A good narrator can bring an additional element of quality and emotion that wasn't found in the original text.

Also, it takes very similar mental attention to listen to a story compared to reading one. I tell people I 'read' audiobooks because it's absolutely equivalent to reading in every way and think it's pedantic to demand a distinction between listening/reading a book.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
My mom listes to audioboks in her car because she spends a lot of time driving. Because she lacks a lot of technical understanding, I download and burn all her books for her. Occasionally, I listen to one. I've listened to the first two Hunger Games titles, for example. In part, I didn't want to take the "risk" buying the books when I could just listen to them. Sometimes, it's nice to be able to not have to read a book.

Mostly, I'd rather just read. I get something different off the printed page (or the e-ink display, since 90% of my reading is now done on a Kindle) than I do from simply listening in. I don't know. Listening makes me feel a lot more passive, but I'm not against it.

Vault101 said:
last time it was a series of unfortunate events....read by Tim Curry
And now I must go find that.

Soulrender95 said:
I think you mean seppuku, unless your planning to commit to a numbers based puzzle game.
This is someone who intentionally wrote "shamefur" so I assumed it was just some internet meme deal.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
BanicRhys said:
So, over the past few weeks, I've "read" 2001: A Space Odyssey, Solaris, Slaughterhouse Five, the first two Foundation books, The Thing on the Doorstep, Shadow Over Innsmouth and several trashy Horus Heresy novels.

By "read", I mean listened to.

Whenever I discuss these novels with someone whose opinion of me I care about, I make sure not to specify that I consumed them in audio form.

Am I being an overly self-conscious pejorative, or should I just go commit Sudoku right now?
I think audiobooks are becoming more acceptable than ever. In the past they existed for those unable to read, whether it be by blindness, old age, or even illiteracy. But now Audible.com has become one of the many "hip" services that Amazon.com provides. Now with the Internet and MP3 players, audiobooks have found new life. People listen to audiobooks the same way they listen to songs, at work or on the road, in situations where they can listen to something. I listen to audiobooks all the time at work, being in computer graphics often leaves me silent in front of a computer for hours on end, only pausing and unplugging so I can listen to how something times out with the audio I'm working with.

So I say don't be ashamed, be proud. Audiobooks are cooler than ever. Being ashamed of listening to a book is like being ashamed of reading a book on an e-reader instead of a physical copy. The only people who care enough to get angry about the distinction are morons whose opinions don't deserve the time of day. And with how successful Audible has become, believe that you are not alone.
 

Bazaalmon

New member
Apr 19, 2009
331
0
0
I work at an office job where we're allowed to listen to stuff on headphones, and I must say that a good audiobook really helps pass the time. I actually just finished book 2 of A Song of Ice and Fire last week, and I'm going to start on Brandon Sanderson's second installment of the Stormlight Archive series. I still read books at home when I have the chance, but it's not always practical to have a book and it's not like I could read at the office when I work. I also agree with many of the earlier posters, a good orator really helps. I actually have the UK version of the Harry Potter audiobooks, which are narrated by Stephen Fry instead of Jim Dale like the US version, and it's quite possibly the greatest thing ever. Books are books, regardless of format. Anyone who gives you attitude for listening to your books in audio form needs to thank their lucky stars that they apparently don't have any real problems in their life and should stop being so petty.
 

Olas

Hello!
Dec 24, 2011
3,226
0
0
snowpuppy said:
I feel a bit of shame. It's almost like cheating.
Wait, books are a test now?

The way I see it, unless you're just trying to show off or strengthen your literacy, there's really no advantage to consuming a story through text as opposed to spoken word. In fact I can see many disadvantages to it as it occupies much more of your attention to read whereas you can listen to an audiobook while doing other activities ie driving, doing dishes, playing Minecraft, etc. Then again, if you're a fast reader you might be able to consume a story much faster by reading it than by listening to it, so there's arguably a trade off.

I think it's a safe bet that everyone in this thread has an acceptable degree of literacy, and is old enough to where their brains are no longer in crucial early development stages, so there's really no reason to dismiss audiobooks. Saying that traditional reading is somehow superior feels like an obnoxious form of elitism over something utterly trivial.

Jim_Callahan said:
If you're using audiobooks so that you can do something else whilst listening, there's no problem with that.

If you're just sitting around listening as an alternative to sitting around reading, yes, you should be ashamed.
Why? Also, I would imagine very few people actually do the latter as it seems somewhat unstimulating to just sit around and stare off into space while listening. Then again, before TV people used to do just that with the radio. One neat thing about radio broadcasts is they would have sound effects and musical backing. I haven't listened to many audiobooks but I get the impression not too many incorporate these elements and I think it could be cool.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Vault101 said:
Snotnarok said:
I had gotten crap from a friend because what I read is technology/science news and not novels or whatever. Closest thing I read is comics, but that's all taboo, especially if all of the reading is electronically done/off a screen. You need REAL books or you're not interesting apparently.

Can't express how shallow the person has to be to think and act on these things.
people have a real thing for physical books..and I do understand it even though I use an E reader

I love the cover art from the 80's/90's one of my favorite things is a copy of "the plains of passage" I remember reading that series at my grandmas house, I remember finding it in an old second hand store, it had a little note written in it...a birthday present from some guy to his mum...

aww gee now I'm getting emotional, sometimes I feel like going to my local second hand bookstore and buying a bunch of paperbacks for the hell of it
I understand the appeal, there's nothing wrong with it but the attitude I saw was snobby instead of emotional. I mean I understand the appeal for others in reading novels, it's awesome. I'm just more nerdy perhaps, I like reading technical articles and science discoveries, it's all exciting to me in ways novels simply aren't. I'm aware it's strange haha.

Yeah my gram was like that, got me emotional in a different way. :\
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
Wut?

Why would they be shameful? That... that makes no sense.

I don't think I've ever heard anyone say anything negative about audio books. "Man, would you believe that Bob listens to audio books? No, I swear, it's true. I know, right? Fuck that guy. We should tar and feather him!"

Hell, I don't think I've ever heard anyone say much of anything about audio books.

Personally haven't listened to one since I was a kid. When I was about eight I used to listen to Enid Blyton stories.

Wouldn't have much reason to listen to one these days. I'm going to be able to read it to myself several times faster than someone can speak. Listening would be frustratingly slow and I don't think it would add much to the experience.

Also because...

Dirty Hipsters said:
I don't actually listen to audio books, but I don't think there's any shame in doing so. It takes a lot of commitment to sit down and read a book, because when you do so you can't do anything else. Listening to an audiobook is a lot more passive, and allows you to do other things at the same time (like driving), so they're much more flexible for someone with a busy schedule.
Lilani said:
I listen to audiobooks all the time at work, being in computer graphics often leaves me silent in front of a computer for hours on end, only pausing and unplugging so I can listen to how something times out with the audio I'm working with.
How on Earth do you guys listen to them while working?

Maybe it's just because I cannot multi-task worth a damn but I would not be able to do that. I'd either get distracted by the audio and stop working effectively or I'd focus on my work and suddenly realise I haven't taken in a single word for the last five minutes.

[sub][sub]Oh hey, another one back from the land of the banned. Is the Escapist having a mass amnesty or something? Although as I recall your ban was by request.[/sub][/sub]

Vault101 said:
I love the cover art from the 80's/90's one of my favorite things is a copy of "the plains of passage" I remember reading that series at my grandmas house, I remember finding it in an old second hand store, it had a little note written in it...a birthday present from some guy to his mum...
Christ, I think I remember that cover.

Was it the one with a man and woman in furs (presumably Ayla and Jondalar) next to a fireplace? She's crouched and looking "out" from the cover while he's standing behind her looking off to the right. Also, there might have been a horse somewhere in there.

I recently saw that series in a store with new covers. They were done in a style that resembled cave paintings. Looked pretty cool actually.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
Zhukov said:
How on Earth do you guys listen to them while working?

Maybe it's just because I cannot multi-task worth a damn but I would not be able to do that. I'd either get distracted by the audio and stop working effectively or I'd focus on my work and suddenly realise I haven't taken in a single word for the last five minutes.

[sub][sub]Oh hey, another one back from the land of the banned. Is the Escapist having a mass amnesty or something? Although as I recall your ban was by request.[/sub][/sub]
Sometimes I am doing something which requires silence (like coming up with a new design or new approach to something), but otherwise a lot of my job is copying and pasting work that's already been done, lol. When making a commercial spot or digital sign, we have a pretty set format and all I'm doing is making copies and applying new product and information into them. As you can imagine, that can get pretty monotonous. Either that, or I'm working on a single project that I know the desire outcome of, so I'm just spending my day working toward that outcome. During those times I need something to break up the silence, and a good story can keep my attention a lot longer than music (with music, I'm tempted to change the song and adjust the volume all the time, but with a story I can just let it run).

[sub][sub]Also, I don't know about the rest, but I was voluntarily banned back then. I got this new job and wanted to completely dedicate myself to it for a while, so I requested a ban :3 Now I've got things more in line so I asked to come back, and they let me.[/sub][/sub]
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Zhukov said:
Christ, I think I remember that cover.

Was it the one with a man and woman in furs (presumably Ayla and Jondalar) next to a fireplace? She's crouched and looking "out" from the cover while he's standing behind her looking off to the right. Also, there might have been a horse somewhere in there.

I recently saw that series in a store with new covers. They were done in a style that resembled cave paintings. Looked pretty cool actually.
with an icy blue color scheme? I belive thats the one..I know it had the wolf in it, I also know the newer covers which are ok...but got nothing on dat 90's

Lilani said:
she actually came back because I came back...;)
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
Wut? Why would they be shameful?

Who are the 22 people who voted YES? That's like voting that cabbage is shameful.
 

Folksoul

New member
May 15, 2010
306
0
0
Do you have severe vision problems/are you blind? Is audio version is the only version in your language? Are you driving or other similar activity? Is the narrator JUST THAT AWESOME!? If so, listen away without guilt. To the OP, you like audiobooks? Do your thing dude. It's all good.

Person in my D&D/MTG circle despises reading. He can, and is not dyslexic or anything. He simply gets offended when he is expected to read that isn't something mandatory like a road sign.

Protip: Don't bash the act of reading in a room full of English majors/ honours lit students. That opened a well of sarcasm that has yet to run dry, even years later.
 

laide234

New member
Aug 30, 2013
12
0
0
Not everyone has the time to actually sit down with a book and read. I listen to audio-books while I commute or work out.
 

tangoprime

Renegade Interrupt
May 5, 2011
716
0
0
laide234 said:
Not everyone has the time to actually sit down with a book and read. I listen to audio-books while I commute or work out.
This one knows what's up.

Audiobooks are great for a long commute or trip. Also great for working out/hiking/running/biking. I have the audiobook version of World War Z's CDs in my car at all times, and have nearly the complete works of HP Lovecraft saved on my car audio system's HD and my mp3 player. WWZ is made pretty great by the fact that each vignette is done by a different voice actor, including Mark Hamill, Simon Pegg, Alan Alda, Rob Reiner, Henry Rollins, and Martin Scorsese.

Audiobooks are also great for flights if your someone who gets a headache trying to read on a plane. Anyone who says you should feel shame for enjoying literature this way is basically just being a snob and/or has never had to deal with a commute or have to multitask. I have a huge collection of things I've read, and a huge backlog of physical books, simply because I don't have the time of day to tear into them, and if I got really hooked into one I know it could potentially make me procrastinate on important things. Listening to a chapter or two of something on the way too and from work, especially if traffic is bad, is a great way to ingest literature that you wouldn't ordinarily be able to fit into your schedule. In reply to an argument against this- if you can't pay attention to an audiobook and drive at the same time, you probably shouldn't be trusted with a motor vehicle to begin with- it's far less distracting than even talking to passengers. Should we not ever have passengers either?
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
I don't think they're shameful, I just don't care for them. The problem, at least for me, is that they don't serve a purpose. I can't listen to them when working out because they neither assist in the workout nor do they provide any real entertainment as I can't really pay much attention when working hard. When driving a car I tend to find they have the opposite problem as they tend to be remarkably distracting and, as such, seem remarkably unsafe. And if I'm not in one of those two scenarios, I can likely just pull out a book and read it myself in a fraction of the time and without the pesky bother of having other people twist my interpretation of what I'm reading.