I personally find it hilarious that people assume that God is "a guy above the clouds watching us", as well as the opposite assumption that "there is lack of sufficient physical evidence to prove that there is a god". I personally believe that if there is a God, He is amused at how we assume all sorts of crap about his existence (or lack thereof) and once we lose the gift of life, He has full dominion of whatever afterlife we couldn't comprehend in our living state. And again, if there is a God, he may perhaps be beyond human comprehension, just as how a dog can never comprehend the internet nor your worker ant being unable to comprehend anything we human beings even say or feel.
Even though I say I'm religious, I totally respect the opinions of atheist that actually have legitimate arguments (particularly the type of argument that wasn't done ad nauseum), unlike like 95% of other self-proclaimed atheists who never did their research in both sides of the argument. In the other side of the coin, this assumed statistic of 95% also applies to other religious people talking out of their ass thinking what they say is according to religion without actually doing their own research as well.
It's funny that I was never really that religious back then (I wasn't even in a practicing religious family - and I was annoyed at the religious side that exists in some of my relatives), but my faith just skyrocketed the more I try to know about the things around me, and all the anti-God arguments seem to actually magnify my belief of a possibility of a greater incomprehensible being that is many leagues beyond our mental capacity letting us live our life until it expires and eventually takes us over beyond the grave. With all the scientific advances we've had, he have little to no idea on what's actually beyond the universe yet, and whatever void that may await us, which just proves to me that whatever science we may have, it's still primitive to said ultimate being given that most of our advances in science and technology are still pretty much grounded within our own planet, with a few studies outside of our orbit here and there.
EDIT: In other news, I'm drunk as f*ck while I was typing all this lol.
Even though I say I'm religious, I totally respect the opinions of atheist that actually have legitimate arguments (particularly the type of argument that wasn't done ad nauseum), unlike like 95% of other self-proclaimed atheists who never did their research in both sides of the argument. In the other side of the coin, this assumed statistic of 95% also applies to other religious people talking out of their ass thinking what they say is according to religion without actually doing their own research as well.
It's funny that I was never really that religious back then (I wasn't even in a practicing religious family - and I was annoyed at the religious side that exists in some of my relatives), but my faith just skyrocketed the more I try to know about the things around me, and all the anti-God arguments seem to actually magnify my belief of a possibility of a greater incomprehensible being that is many leagues beyond our mental capacity letting us live our life until it expires and eventually takes us over beyond the grave. With all the scientific advances we've had, he have little to no idea on what's actually beyond the universe yet, and whatever void that may await us, which just proves to me that whatever science we may have, it's still primitive to said ultimate being given that most of our advances in science and technology are still pretty much grounded within our own planet, with a few studies outside of our orbit here and there.
EDIT: In other news, I'm drunk as f*ck while I was typing all this lol.