Poll: Backwards Compatibility

Recommended Videos

daribian

New member
May 2, 2009
184
0
0
the strange thing about backwards compatibility is it eventually stopped working for me, when i had my PS2 i used to play a lot of PS1 games on it but eventually they stopped working, i first put this down to bad conditions my PS1 games were in but i played them on a friends PS2 and they worked fine.
 

Ghadente

White Rabbit
Mar 21, 2009
537
0
0
how would it not be? its a + not a -
adding the ability for backwards compatibility is never a negative thing, only the lack of it can be bad.

* and the PS3 is backwards compatible... why are some people stating it isn't?
 

Stammer

New member
Apr 16, 2008
1,725
0
0
Eric the Orange said:
Sorry for my internet acronym ineptitude but what does TLDR mean?
Too Long; Didn't read.

Basically means "attention to anyone who didn't want to read my wall of text, for this is a summary of what I just said".
 

McClaud

New member
Nov 2, 2007
923
0
0
I can tell you why console game makers are moving away from backwards compatability:

To make you buy all your old games over again

While it's not entirely Nintendo's fault (since cartridge games are obsolete and trying to make one Nintendo system accept all their old games would be impossible), it sort of starts there. One of the selling points of the Wii was you were going to be able to d/l all the old Nintendo games from an online store and play them on the Wii. Live was starting to understand the concept of what a huge money-maker that could be, so they jumped on that bandwagon (why make a patch for Fable when you can just get the owner to buy a version that works flawlessly - in theory - on the 360?). Sony totally realized the potential to make mad money that way, so they were able to completely validate their taking b/c out of their PS3.

Be prepared to see future consoles have absolutely no backwards compatability. This way, the system can force you to buy all your games again for the new one (if you are that hooked on old games, that is). PlayStation Network is already prepping to sell you all the oldies for the PS2, and it aggravates me that due to my company's business, I have made it possible.
 

S.H.A.R.P.

New member
Mar 4, 2009
883
0
0
I think it would be silly for any gaming platform not to be backwards compatible. But well, PC gamers can still play games from 20 years ago... Poor console people...
 

Inco

Swarm Agent
Sep 12, 2008
1,116
0
0
Ghadente said:
* and the PS3 is backwards compatible... why are some people stating it isn't?
Because the first gen ones were, but when they released the 40 gig models they sacrificed it (backwards Compatibility) for some odd reason. Im not sure if they brought it back yet, i think they have.
 

tk1989

New member
May 20, 2008
865
0
0
Inconsistancies Arise said:
Ghadente said:
* and the PS3 is backwards compatible... why are some people stating it isn't?
Because the first gen ones were, but when they released the 40 gig models they sacrificed it (backwards Compatibility) for some odd reason. Im not sure if they brought it back yet, i think they have.
It was removed from the PS3 to cut prices. The PS3 was already severely underpriced for what they were selling it for, they were trying to cut costs.
 

NewGeekPhilosopher

New member
Feb 25, 2009
892
0
0
If Rorsharch had a console he'd probably say something like...

"Never compromise. Never surrender (Backwards compatibility)".

He seems like the type of guy who would rather break Iwata's fingers to get backwards compatibility for his DSi than to accept the loss of backwards compatibility and move on. Thank goodness I'm not Rorsharch, or all ten of Iwata's fingers would be broken right now. And he would have to play Wii with his FEET.
 

Taylorcrw

New member
Jan 30, 2009
137
0
0
I love backwards compatibility but the xbox 360 isn't great for playing xbox games.If I play kotor 1 or 2 it will start to freeze after awhile making it impossible to play.
 

Lord_Jaroh

Ad-Free Finally!
Apr 24, 2007
569
2
23
McClaud said:
I can tell you why console game makers are moving away from backwards compatability:

To make you buy all your old games over again

While it's not entirely Nintendo's fault (since cartridge games are obsolete and trying to make one Nintendo system accept all their old games would be impossible), it sort of starts there. One of the selling points of the Wii was you were going to be able to d/l all the old Nintendo games from an online store and play them on the Wii. Live was starting to understand the concept of what a huge money-maker that could be, so they jumped on that bandwagon (why make a patch for Fable when you can just get the owner to buy a version that works flawlessly - in theory - on the 360?). Sony totally realized the potential to make mad money that way, so they were able to completely validate their taking b/c out of their PS3.

Be prepared to see future consoles have absolutely no backwards compatability. This way, the system can force you to buy all your games again for the new one (if you are that hooked on old games, that is). PlayStation Network is already prepping to sell you all the oldies for the PS2, and it aggravates me that due to my company's business, I have made it possible.
This is what I fear too, and it's my main gripe with the Playstation Network allowing me to rebuy games I already own. Now, I can understand charging for what Capcom has done with SFII and MvsCII in making them high def and online capable (if not a few other features). That I can see being a feature worth charging a nominal fee for. But basically copy/pasting the disk onto a download network and saying "buy it again because we're not giving you the ability to do this with your own games" Well, that's where I take issue. Companies should be doing one of three things:

1. Do what Capcom is doing and released updated versions of old games. I would pay money to have the old Armored Cores released in the new engine (or as downloadable addons to the existing games).

2. Release a tool to let you upload your own catalogue to your harddrive. This is iffy, but really, it's not like they will lose money by doing this. Plus it's not like people can go completely crazy and upload all of their games and their friends' games and Blockbusters' games too...not enough harddrive space and all that.

3. Release the old games as free downloads or as packages with new games. Promote your franchises/series/company.

Of all of them, 1 is my optimum choice, as having the games updated for the current gen makes sense, and makes a lot of games playable. Companies now are looking to rip off the consumer rather than working with them for a Better Gaming Tomorrow(TM). If that keeps going, we could look at another video game crash. I wish I could say that companies were smarter than that, but no one looks to the future, only immediate cash in hand, and that's where this failure is.
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
I think Sony NOW would argue that BC is a BIG selling point. Part of my reasoning behind my decision to get the PS3 with BC (software based) was so that I could still play old PS2 games on it. Thanks to my PS3 I'll be able to finally finish off the Sands of Time Trilogy.
 

The_Deleted

New member
Aug 28, 2008
2,188
0
0
What puts me off the DSi is the region locking. Well done Ninty, you've just fucked off those of us who loved to import the games worth having.

Wankers.
 

Ghost

Spoony old Bard
Feb 13, 2009
893
0
0
yes 95.2% (237)
no 4.8% (12)

wow. and of course, it is a fantastic selling point for any console.