No, I don't get the point. If a game looks intresting and has gotten positive reviews I'll most likely buy and enjoy it. I won't stay away just because an EVIIIIIL company are resposible for it.
I don't see what difference it makes to you. Let people buy or don't buy what they want.aftohsix said:Blacklisting a games company is stupid. The best example for me that comes to mind is Bioware. I see a TON of hatred spewed towards Bioware and I really can't understand it.
If a game isn't good don't buy it. You don't need to swear off the company at large. Oftentimes different teams make different products within a company.
You'll rant all day about what assholes you think they are, but you'll still buy their games if they offer you what you want? You're only making a stand as long as it's convenient for you, and that's the worst stand to take.Vigormortis said:I've never done it in the past. I always just looked to the quality of the games. But with recent events in the past few years, I've changed that policy.
I can now say that I have, or rather will, be fully "black listing" the following publishers:
Activision/Blizzard - Once Diablo 3 hits, and I gauge how good it actually is, I can guarantee it'll be the last game I buy from them. Assuming I even do buy it.
EA - Dead Space 2 and Battlefield 3 were the last games I bought from them. And I see no reason to change that fact. Not until EA grows the hell up.
Ubisoft - Since they've basically given a colossal middle-finger to all PC gamers, calling us thieves and such, I'm done with them too. The only thing I plan to buy from them is Rayman Origins. Once that game's in my library, I'm done with Ubisoft.
That's about it really. There have been other developers and publishers that have done really stupid, annoying, and aggravating BS in the past, but nothing as incredibly retarded as the above three. Especially when one considers that the above have actively INSULTED their customers, repeatedly, and gotten away with it.
So yeah. Fuck them.
And you've completely misunderstood my stance. Diablo 3 was/is a game I've been looking forward to for years. YEARS. Long before Activision/Blizzard started it's current trend of bullshit. I'm also waiting to see if it's even going to be worth the purchase. (which, by the way, isn't likely)ReinWeisserRitter said:You'll rant all day about what assholes you think they are, but you'll still buy their games if they offer you what you want? You're only making a stand as long as it's convenient for you, and that's the worst stand to take.Vigormortis said:I've never done it in the past. I always just looked to the quality of the games. But with recent events in the past few years, I've changed that policy.
I can now say that I have, or rather will, be fully "black listing" the following publishers:
Activision/Blizzard - Once Diablo 3 hits, and I gauge how good it actually is, I can guarantee it'll be the last game I buy from them. Assuming I even do buy it.
EA - Dead Space 2 and Battlefield 3 were the last games I bought from them. And I see no reason to change that fact. Not until EA grows the hell up.
Ubisoft - Since they've basically given a colossal middle-finger to all PC gamers, calling us thieves and such, I'm done with them too. The only thing I plan to buy from them is Rayman Origins. Once that game's in my library, I'm done with Ubisoft.
That's about it really. There have been other developers and publishers that have done really stupid, annoying, and aggravating BS in the past, but nothing as incredibly retarded as the above three. Especially when one considers that the above have actively INSULTED their customers, repeatedly, and gotten away with it.
So yeah. Fuck them.
I did read what you wrote, and it boils down to "I'll only refuse to give them my money until they put out something I want to buy from them". You can divert attention from it with padding and accusations if it makes you feel better, but it remains that you're bitching about them, then saying you're going to pay them to continue anyway, but just this once, which makes it okay. It doesn't matter when you were interested in the games; your issues with the publishers are apparently current. It just makes you come off as a hypocrite, which is fine, as that's more or less our defining trait as a species, but don't get all prima donna when someone calls you out on it.Vigormortis said:And you've completely misunderstood my stance. Diablo 3 was/is a game I've been looking forward to for years. YEARS. Long before Activision/Blizzard started it's current trend of bullshit. I'm also waiting to see if it's even going to be worth the purchase. (which, by the way, isn't likely)
Rayman Origins is a game that I was interested in before Ubisoft decided to shaft the PC gamers. And even then, I only want to buy it because it's amazing fun and I want to support the people behind it. Especially Michel Ancel.
Also, you seem to have missed the part where I said these two games would be the very last thing I buy from them. I don't care what they make from now on, these two games are the last. (I'm already done with EA, even if that means I miss out on things like Mirror's Edge 2) And, unless they make drastic changes to their incredibly stupid policies and procedures, that's going to remain my stance on their games.
So if you don't mind, maybe try actually reading what I wrote before you decide to insult me. It's rather obnoxious to do otherwise.