If we blocked up the beaches like in WW2, and laid sea mines etc, we would be pretty hard to attack, as getting heavy armored vehicles in would be near impossible...
This, very much this. Anyone hearing 'AK 47's for eeeeveryone' in their head when they read it?Mazty said:Plus England has football hooligans. They're an army in their own right.
Special ops can't do dick if they are bombed into submission.CaptainEgypt said:Yeah, you don't fuck with British special ops, some of the best trained soldiers in the world. In my opinion, and as an American, they make our Marines and SEALS look like pussies.Nmil-ek said:If factoring in Airstrikes no, infantry wise the UK has always been difficult to topple we are a naturaly fortified island with whats considered one of the worlds strongest navy but a show of supperior force would make it a war of attrition.
If we think about our European/American Allies yeah we are pretty much untouchable.
But maybe that's because every Marine and SEAL I've ever met was just a jagoff with a tough guy complex.
I wouldn't even give us ten years, we import basically all of our food and oil so we'd be finished in a matter of months.RedMenace said:England vs The World? Dont make me laugh.
Paratroopers + air strikes + naval blockade. Hell, just a naval blockade would be enough, with no incoming resources an island nation will have to give in eventually (I'd give it 10 years).
Souplex said:William the conqueror did it.
And we all know the French have never won a war ;P. It's a law of nature, it can't happen.BudZer said:It'd be incredibly easy considering it's just England. The Scottish and Welsh could join in, and clear it up for the French. The French could just ride over on a huge troop train from the Chunnel and raid London, sack the city, and bang, it's over. Of course that would require the French to win a war.
Perhaps the Americans could just station themselves in Paris.
The USA? Yes. Russia? Doubtful. China? No.Thanatos34 said:On topic: Of course it could be invaded and conquered. The US could do it, Russia could do it, possibly China.
This. When you can post 11 of the most advanced and deadly ships in the world around you(not to mention nuclear subs) then it is VERY hard to invade anyone. On topic, if everyone attacked Britain at once, no contest, just to many forces. One on one only Russia, China and the US could possibly take them.Bulletinmybrain said:The U.S has 298 ships. U.K has 105. You don't even want to know the aircraft carrier ration.. 11:2Trivun said:We have the greatest army in the world except on numbers (America and China beat us there). I'm sorry, USA, but it's true, we do have a better army, you simply beat us on numbers, but our technology is actually just as good as or better than yours on pretty much all fronts. The only problem is that cost cutting Labour don't like spending so hardly any sees the front line. If we did have that stuff out there instead of lying around in equipment stores back at Sandhurst, Cosford, Plymouth, Cranwell and everywhere else, then it's a widely held fact we would easily be able to beat the Americans in battle. As it happens, simply because of that we would be able to resist most attacks on our country (not counting nuclear warfare, but since we also apparently have nukes [I'm still slightly unsure there though] then everyone would lose there).
That said, no country, even America, is completely invulnerable. I know quite a bit about military tactics, warfare in general, the UK Armed Forces and have first hand experience of UK military training. But I can safely say that with a well trained and large enough force, we could still be invaded successfully. By the same token we could probably invade America (thank you, 'special relationship', take what you want, why don't you?). Love Actually reference in the brackets, by the way. No country is invulnerable, and the UK is no exception.
By the way, England hasn't been successfully invaded since 1066. Since then, the English have beaten the Scottish in several wars and it was only the rise of the Stuart monarchy that finally united the two countries. Hence your comment is historically BS. Sorry, but any history textbook will support my statement over yours.Schmee said:England can be invaded, and has been a couple times. I'm fine in Scotland, so far unconquered, and since we werent included in the "invulnerable" statment then uhm, we could just walk over the border, invasion commences.
Russia is quite a bit more powerful, and more of a threat, than most people give them credit for. (This is based mostly on my dad's opinion, who is an ex-submarine commander.)Krall said:The USA? Yes. Russia? Doubtful. China? No.Thanatos34 said:On topic: Of course it could be invaded and conquered. The US could do it, Russia could do it, possibly China.
China couldn't actually get to the British Isles, as it doesn't have a blue water fleet.
I doubt Russia is advanced enough and has the resources to establish air superiority over the British Isles and to decisively defeat the Royal Navy, so any landing they attempt would be likely to fail.
The space between the back of my skull and the front of it.Maraveno said:You're also wrongwhaleswiththumbs said:It wouldn't be impossible, unlike Scandinavia(those mountainous Euro rednecks, lol a new stereotype for all of ya). Germany could have done it in WWII if they felt like it, but they already had other countries to act as landfill.
They tried and failed though they never landed any troops if I'm correct they tried long and hard to make an opening for their troops
History noobs....
PS: Where did you create that stereotype from?
And the Scotish independence wars.Motti said:British History of invasions:
Romans
Saxons
Vikings
Normans
Themselves (civil war)
I rest my case.