I can't think of any justifiable strategic reason for Slovakia to have conscription given that it is a member of NATO and isn't in any danger from aggression, unlike S Korea and Israel which do have conscription and must contend with serious threats across their borders.
To those who say that conscription teaches young people self-discipline: What about all those healthy, mature and well adjusted young people who don't need to be taught self-discipline? Why should they give two years of their lives for something that's not going to benefit them because some other young people aren't as motivated as they are?
To those who say that having an armed and trained populace can counter government tyranny: North Korea.
And finally, why should the armed forces have to cater for hundreds of thousands of people who don't want to be there when they could be using their resources to get the best out of those who volunteered?
To those who say that conscription teaches young people self-discipline: What about all those healthy, mature and well adjusted young people who don't need to be taught self-discipline? Why should they give two years of their lives for something that's not going to benefit them because some other young people aren't as motivated as they are?
To those who say that having an armed and trained populace can counter government tyranny: North Korea.
And finally, why should the armed forces have to cater for hundreds of thousands of people who don't want to be there when they could be using their resources to get the best out of those who volunteered?