Considering that it's an expression that refers to thoughts and feelings, it exists so long as people think it exists.
I think that's untrue and unfair. I know women I would never under any circumstances have sex with. And before someone says it, it's not an appearance thing. Two of my "never" women are attractive enough to model.Women have two different ladders, they are able to rank men on a "friendship value" ladder totally separate from the "sex value" ladder. Each man can be on one or both ladders and can hold vastly different positions from one to the other. Men only have the sex ladder. There is no woman they've met who they don't want to have sex with. It's only a matter of how bad they want it.
THATS the point.. If one partner acts in a way that indicates romantic interest, ike acting touchy-feely, going on date and date-like activities, being very sensual but denying romantiv interest and say no to a relationship but continue this behaviior, they are shit.dragonswarrior said:You wanna know something funny? From personal experience, I know it exists. However, I don't think it's NEARLY as endemic as everyone else thinks, nor is the "friend zone" something inherently evil.[..]
I think where that term could apply is in cases like mine. In high school, I had a best friend whom I had a crush on. Thing is... she had a crush on me too. And admitted it to everyone except me. And told everyone except me that she would like to marry me some day. And despite the fact that she knew I liked her, and she liked me, she insisted we stay just friends and she would always date and chase other folk and quite honestly leave me hanging.
Now, of course, all of this was because she was a horrible person[..]
Well sometimes people dont see that. I for myself cant flirt for shit, that means that unless I am interested in the guys or gals and approach them or they approach me and are open with it i just never consider any romantic interrest.Adamantium93 said:Does it exist? Heck yes, it does, thought I think most people have the wrong of it.
The "Friendzone" isn't "I've been Jane's friend for two years but she's not interested in me."
It's
"I'm not into Jack romantically, but I know he likes me. So, if I flirt with him and make him believe he has a shot at me I can get him to do anything." Basically, all the responsibilities of being in a relationship without any of the wholesome, fulfilling intimacy.
The difference being that in the first situation, Jane simply doesn't want to be in a relationship with Jack. She wants to stay friends. In the second, Jane still doesn't want to be in a relationship with Jack, but she intentionally uses Jack's feelings for her to control him.