I'll admit that I check it every once and awhile and I do occasionally laugh at his comics, but I don't really find them particularly funny. It really stopped having good jokes in it some time ago.
LFG is taking itself abit seiously these days...read the first one again...its much funnierurglen said:I like it and read it on a regular basis but I definitely prefer Least I could Do and Looking for Group.
I think haters mostly...well, hate it because of the more dramatic direction Tim went with the comic. I love the comic, too, but only because I've grown somewhat attached to the characters over the years. I miss the good ol' days where Ethan would just get drunk and invent holidays or build time machines, but I also care now what actually happens to them.revolverwolf said:As much as it pains me to use the phrase, "This."TheNamlessGuy said:OT: I like all of it, I can say proudly
I don't understand why people hate it to be honest. Could someone enlighten me to the reason(s)?
I Second this!Spinozaad said:I don't care, simply because the best webcomic has already been made. And no, it isn't the bland anti-humor that is Penny Arcade. I talk, of course, of Dr. McNinja.
I think that was a dead sparrow.Broken Orange said:I Second this!Spinozaad said:I don't care, simply because the best webcomic has already been made. And no, it isn't the bland anti-humor that is Penny Arcade. I talk, of course, of Dr. McNinja.
On CAD, i have no need to hate it, makes me laugh. Didn't Calvin and Hobbes try to be serious with a dead raccoon? I don't hear anyone hatin' on Calvin.
This except I've stopped reading. To be honest I think he'd do better if he just made an independent drama story that isn't using characters originally designed for gaming jokes. The lack of character progression wouldn't be a bother if there was no story, and the story wouldn't be a bother if... yeah.Jiggabyte said:"Hate" is such a strong word. I think the art is generally pretty static and dull, the plot tends to be over-the-top and ridiculous which conflicts horribly with the serious nature he tries to take, the dialogue is suffocating, the characters are bland and based on self-insertion and the parodies are generally unoriginal. I still read it, though. Not quite sure why, but I do. Maybe my inner critic is just working too hard.