I would agree, kids are great and lighten the heart most of the time, and when they arn't its the result of poor parenting.shewolf51 said:They're ok. What I hate is when parents can't control the buggers.
the argument is that having more children increases population densities, and dense populations are consummate polluters, due to more cars, and more industry to support the larger populace. Not to mention more mouths to feed, which can lead to bad land use, which leads to denser populations.Lonan said:How could hating children speed up global warming?
Yes but hating children would reduce births, and slow down global warming.Altorin said:the argument is that having more children increases population densities, and dense populations are consummate polluters, due to more cars, and more industry to support the larger populace. Not to mention more mouths to feed, which can lead to bad land use, which leads to denser populations.Lonan said:How could hating children speed up global warming?
One kid doesn't cause Global Warming, but the argument is a few million families choosing to have just one or two more kids can have an effect.
I didn't say the option made sense, I was just explaining how children are generally tied to global warming. For all I know or care, the OP got the option backwards of just plain wrong.Lonan said:Yes but hating children would reduce births, and slow down global warming.Altorin said:the argument is that having more children increases population densities, and dense populations are consummate polluters, due to more cars, and more industry to support the larger populace. Not to mention more mouths to feed, which can lead to bad land use, which leads to denser populations.Lonan said:How could hating children speed up global warming?
One kid doesn't cause Global Warming, but the argument is a few million families choosing to have just one or two more kids can have an effect.