lol thats what i get for not reading carefullyThe_root_of_all_evil said:Wrong, cogito ergo sum is "I think, therefore I am."apsycogerbil said:wrong, its cogito ergo sumThe_root_of_all_evil said:Constitutio Ergo Sum.
I post, therefore I am.Nil Desperandum
It's not that you're nothingness, it's just that you don't exist in the conventional sense. Simply believing that you are a thinking, emotional, physically embodied creature does not strictly make it so. Saying that "I'm here, because I'm saying that I'm here" is not really useful. It's a sort of bare assertion fallacy.Evilbunny said:Nothingness cannot think or have complex emotions. I think, therefore I am.
This is what I wass going to say. Sans Latin.The_root_of_all_evil said:Constitutio Ergo Sum.
I post, therefore I am.
Pretty much this. I'd like to add that if someone just imagines or simulates all this mess, his imagination or simulator is a complete shite with a side order of fries.Ren3004 said:Why would someone think about me for nearly 20 years?
[sub]And if someone really has, get a life![/sub]
Therein lies one of the main problems, nobody gives a shit that it's been done many times before, leading to a constant supply of these damned threads. Granted, it's better than silly versus threads, but not by much.Someone probably asked this before, but I don't care