They could introduce him for like 5 minutes and then have Joker beat him to death with a crowbar?
"Tacos!" then?geddydisciple said:Where is the option for "i don't care either way i'll still watch the movies"?
Robin makes Batman gayBlindswordmaster said:Robin makes Batman family friendly.
Seeing as the new Batman films are almost [sub]why so[/sub] 'serious' adding Robin would be like adding lead to a perfectly working rubber dingyBlindswordmaster said:Movie Bob said something during his review of The Losers that made me cringe: he actually proposed that the current Batman movie series should have Robin.
That's a really stupid reason to refuse to be in a sequel. That said, I could care less. If done RIGHT Robin could be a good addition. Myself though would rather see Batgirl.AccursedTheory said:Christan Bale and Christopher Nolan both REFUSE to participate in the Batman movies if Robin comes in. So it a mute point.
Remember, this is the actor who flipped a method-acting shit on the set of Terminator Salvation, a highbrow film if ever there was one. Bale does not strike me as a man who picks his battles.Xavier78 said:That's a really stupid reason to refuse to be in a sequel. That said, I could care less. If done RIGHT Robin could be a good addition. Myself though would rather see Batgirl.AccursedTheory said:Christan Bale and Christopher Nolan both REFUSE to participate in the Batman movies if Robin comes in. So it a mute point.
Eggzactly! I mean have you seen any of those old Batman episodes? Both Batman and Robin were really goofy and it wasn't dark at all, mercilessly playing with words and dealing with criminals like The Film Freak (EDIT:comic only, ironically) and Egghead.Wizzie said:Batman is anything but crazy, to be honest.
But hey, why can't Robin work?
He doesn't have to be the goofy boy wonder, look at how Batman has evolved across the ages.
I'm sure those two would refuse if old Batman came in too.AccursedTheory said:Christan Bale and Christopher Nolan both REFUSE to participate in the Batman movies if Robin comes in. So it a mute point.Blindswordmaster said:Movie Bob said something during his review of The Losers that made me cringe: he actually proposed that the current Batman movie series should have Robin. I don't think that Batman needs Robin. Robin makes him less dark and brooding. Robin makes Batman family friendly. Batman is crazy, determined, and kinda sadistic. Robin waters him down, makes him less awesome. Do you want Batman to have Robin? Would you still watch the current Batman movies if they introduced Robin? No flaming, no trolling, just polite debate. Go.
I really doubt that they would write off the Joker from Nolan's series just because Heath Ledger kicked the bucket. Don't get me wrong, it was a standout performance, but the character is just too instrumental in the Batman storyline (i.e. death of Jason Todd; crippling of Barbara Gordon).AccursedTheory said:Don't worry, the Joker will fix that!Blindswordmaster said:She's like 14 and there's implications that they fucked in Batman Beyond! Batman does not need the Commissioner Gordon's jailbait running around!Treblaine said:fuck, I'm the only one who voted batgirl... at the time I voted.
No, Batman needs bat-girl because everyone is sex crazed nowadays, if batman has a dog as his new sidekick people will ask "are they fucking?" (not really, but you know they would with Robin) so it might as well be an adult female human as a sidekick for now and get rid of the awkwardness.
Oh wait, no more Joker... shit. Who's going to paralyze her?
irishdelinquent said:I'm going to be the only one who probably throws out his vote in favour of Robin. Robin adds something that Batman is missing; the human element. Robin, while painfully innocent and naiive, makes an excellent contrast to Batman. Where Batman's costume is dark, angular, and menacing, Robin's costume is bright, vibrant, and improvised. Whereas Batman lived his childhood scarred by the loss of his parents, Robin grew up in a happy family, bonding by literally putting his life in his family's hands as an acrobat. Robin plays an excellent foil to Batman, both a redeeming quality and a crippling weakness.
Robin, as seen by many, is nothing but a hindrance; he's ass in a fight, he's useless as a detective, and he often is the bait for many a Bat-trap. Not only that, but now Bruce Wayne's bank account has to feed another mouth, clothe another body, and equip another utility belt (not to mention how many vehicles and devices he has to de-Bat so Robin can handle them). Why, in the name of God would Bruce Wayne keep someone so useless around. Simple, in Robin he sees something he longs to be. He sees the childhood that Robin had, and longs to know that warmth. He sees Robin like a brother and a son, and so that strong emotional attachment gives Batman more of a human quality (arguably more than any other character besides Alfred). Batman could always leave Robin in the clutches of the Joker, abandoning him to a cruel (if not inventive) death, accompanied by cackling laughter. However, he won't, because in Robin he sees himself, or at least a Bruce Wayne that could have been.