Tanis said:
Does Steam need to increase its quality control and start the Purge?
I'd say they need to rethink Greenlight.
As with anything else, I think they started the project in good faith. They thought they'd attract passionate indies without a publishing platform, but it's instead turned into a way for shady shits to dump their quick cash-ins. Their hands-off and liberal approach has its positives, but Greenlight needs active curation, or clear publishing guidelines. If they cull anything out of the Romaine brothers (aka Digital Homicide) and the Unity Asset Flippers, they need to make sure it all *stays* culled.
Considering, I voted no. Just purging the cruft wouldn't suffice, anyone could still apply for Greenlight with more scummy crap. If Greenlight were curated - as in, sifted through with human eye-holes set on favouring quality applicants - we'd end up with good stuff. Unfortunately, that means work that goes outside of the money-generating system Valve's set up for itself. It's likely that Valve considers that curation isn't its business.
Look at it from a business standpoint. If you were a prospective Cabal Lead at Valve, would you want to be affected to overseeing everyone else's games, when you could be developing one or leading further research? Probably not.