Poll: Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe to have nude scene in final Harry Potter films?
- Thread starter Caligulove
- Start date
Interestingly enough there was a court case in Ontario about this same thing. The woman was charged with, as you said, indecent exposure. She won the case and the law was changed, so now its not illegal here. People still prefer to where their shirts though, as it is part of the "norm of society" but a least they have the option.Labyrinth said:
So the fact that there were seven books has no bearing on the number of movies? I take it you don't watch James Bond ever. Granted, the don't care option needs to be there, but seven movies isn't pushing it at all for the fans of the series.Dark knifer said:
OT: I haven't read the 7th book, but there damn well better be full on nudity in it or the movie producers all need to be taken out back and shot! If they added nudity in for the movie, that's bloody fucking disgusting...
This is why I despair over western art and entertainment. Maybe I'll go see what Can'tFaketheFunk is saying about Iron Man and see if that lifts my spirits...
That's a pretty good point.Captain Blackout said:
James Bond has completely different movies based off the exact same book years apart, without it being a "reboot".
It would be like if in 25 years they made Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone, used largely the same story, but called it a sequel to the Deathly Hallows
To all the people who are saying that the Harry Potter movies are supposed to be Family Friendly, are you insane? The last book is a god damn bloodbath. If you've read the book, you'll know what I'm talking about.
Baron Khaine said:
The scene where Snape dies is particularly horrible in that regard. You really get the impression that this guy isn't bleeding to death, but rather drowning in his own blood, if i remember correctly.. It has been a while since I read it, and I was quite tired after reading it for almost 9 hours straight (I was reading it aloud, so it took longer.. read it aloud in one sitting).. I do remember being mortified by that scene though
I know a bunch of people who have let you get away with this, but I'm not going to be one of them!Octorok said:
How the HELL do you get from one (probably) tasteful and mostly covered nude scene to "porn star"? Are you aware of how many actresses have done nude scenes and not gone on to do porn? Are you aware that one actress who has done porn has already had a leading role in a Harry Potter film, and no one started having orgies on the pavement because of it?
Is it just because she's 19? Is the fact that she's been acting for half her natural life not enough to think that she might just be able to handle it? She's not some Disney Brat who's been kept pure and virginal for the extra publicity when she goes off the rails.
Clearly, you haven't seen the films. They are far from childish. The first couple are more lighthearted, because they were more or less an introduction into the world in which this takes place, but beyond that--starting with The Prisoner of Azkaban they are in no way, shape, or form "childish." First of all, I highly doubt there is going to be graphic nudity; not because of the nature of the films, but because it would be out of place. It would be contrived. People seem incapable of viewing the franchise as a whole, which is how it is supposed to be viewed. It is an epic, fantasy saga, on par with The Lord of the Rings trilogy, which is told in seven installments (the seventh film being split into two doesn't count). The complex themes and intricate storylines, not to mention the philosophical and political ideologies and frequent use of metaphor and symbolism, transcend the boundaries of children's literature and cinema. The complete and utter stupidity displayed by most people who either claim to dislike the franchise (almost all of which have ever even read the books or seen the films) or those who are lukewarm movie goers is so overwhelming it's almost exhausting to even deal with. Most of you simply don't get it and never will. FACT: Anybody who thinks this is a children's series is completely and utterly insane and possesses the IQ of a rock. It's your loss, not mine; but don't expect to run your mouths and make comments and for others to not say anything, because people such as myself who have followed this incredible story since the very start will call you out on your bullshit every time. Count on it.Ryuk2 said:
I saw the first two and i didn't like them. They were not bad, they were just for different audiences.Balboa said:
Maybe they get more serious in the third movie, but i stopped caring. If i don't like the first two, that means i wont see the third one. That means that I don't dislike the whole franchise, just the start of it.
I was 8-10 (i think) when i saw the first movie and thought that it was childish and i could be wrong about them.
First its a film targeted towards children. So underwear at the most. Also where the hell do those to get naked in the books?!
I think that overall that I don't think its much of a big deal whether or not the actors themselves are taking their clothes off. I really dont care about that fact at all.
But I just dont like the idea of it because it seems gratuitous.
And understanding that of course the characters are growing up and getting more adult. But at the same time- the drastic change to suddenly sexing them up is just... too much of a strange switch out of the rest of the mood.
I feel like it would be one of those moments where the film will break you out of following the plot to suddenly think about... "what the hell was that?" and then focusing on it too much. I think it would hurt the screenplay more than anything
But I just dont like the idea of it because it seems gratuitous.
And understanding that of course the characters are growing up and getting more adult. But at the same time- the drastic change to suddenly sexing them up is just... too much of a strange switch out of the rest of the mood.
I feel like it would be one of those moments where the film will break you out of following the plot to suddenly think about... "what the hell was that?" and then focusing on it too much. I think it would hurt the screenplay more than anything
