Quite, because you're the one using an aside to derail a thread.Abedeus said:Yah, you are right. Let's go back to the days of old and sacrifice some animals to Zeus.Anarchemitis said:Entropy is actually my main argument why Evolutionism is just as laughable as Christianity.
...Are you feeling fine?
Even if it is, our current timeline would probably end. Unless spacetime is unaffected (I'm no scientific expert, so feel free to lecture me).RetiarySword said:I'm normaly against this doomsday threads, but this is scientific to a degree (kelvin). Possibly, if the universe lives that long. But some scientists theorise that the universe expands and collapses in on itself indefinatly. So it could just be apart of a cycle.
Haha, I wish. Freaking out would be silly, seeing as we've got a few years left, not to understate or anything. Anyway, no, found it in a physics journal at the library.stinkychops said:sO I see you picked up a science magazine and are now freaking out.
This is all proven by the fact the light from distant galaxies is turning into longer waves.
By the way, its also based around the idea of potential energy dilution. / edit
Well yea our timeline would end, to a degree. Time is effected by gravity, but I realy can't be arsed to go into it.CuddlyCombine said:Even if it is, our current timeline would probably end. Unless spacetime is unaffected (I'm no scientific expert, so feel free to lecture me).RetiarySword said:I'm normaly against this doomsday threads, but this is scientific to a degree (kelvin). Possibly, if the universe lives that long. But some scientists theorise that the universe expands and collapses in on itself indefinatly. So it could just be apart of a cycle.
You should read this:Valiance said:You make it sound as if humanity, or other "ALEIN" races will have no effect on this, will not have awareness of it, will not have billions of years to progress towards stopping it, etc.
It's not like I have faith in the human race as a whole, but the ingenuity of certain outstanding members of it certainly has the possibility of taking care of this sort of thing.
Asimov is fucking incredible. That's all I have to say.Joos said:You should read this:Valiance said:You make it sound as if humanity, or other "ALEIN" races will have no effect on this, will not have awareness of it, will not have billions of years to progress towards stopping it, etc.
It's not like I have faith in the human race as a whole, but the ingenuity of certain outstanding members of it certainly has the possibility of taking care of this sort of thing.
http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html
Is that statement always true? Absolutely so?Arbitrary Cidin said:Absolutes are an imaginary concept.
Weight is compared to the kilogram weight in France, weight also depends on gravity and is a force. Are you saying because man thought of it that doesn't exist?stinkychops said:Time is just comparing events to the rotation of the earth around the sun.RetiarySword said:Well yea our timeline would end, to a degree. Time is effected by gravity, but I realy can't be arsed to go into it.CuddlyCombine said:Even if it is, our current timeline would probably end. Unless spacetime is unaffected (I'm no scientific expert, so feel free to lecture me).RetiarySword said:I'm normaly against this doomsday threads, but this is scientific to a degree (kelvin). Possibly, if the universe lives that long. But some scientists theorise that the universe expands and collapses in on itself indefinatly. So it could just be apart of a cycle.
Doesn't realy matter though, We are talking like stupid amounts of time.
There is no such thing, if nothing exists which could be 'compared' with anything else, then there is no time.
Nothing can be proven.stinkychops said:No, I'm just putting light on the fact time cannot be proven.
No I'm not.stinkychops said:Ahh, your talking about the whole 10 dmension thingie,Maze1125 said:Nothing can be proven.stinkychops said:No, I'm just putting light on the fact time cannot be proven.
The concept on time existing as a dimension however has a hell of a lot of evidence.
Yes, the word "dimension" does all for a large number of possibilities but, in context, it only allows for a far reduced set of possibilities and those still have a very large amount of evidence for them.of course theres evidence for it, the word dimension allows a pretty broad spectrum of possibilities.
The entirety of Relativity is founded on the concept that time is a dimension extremely similar to space. If that concept is wrong, then so is Relativity.stinkychops said:I was also unaware that there was evidence to suggest that if everypoint of a persons movement through what is conceived as 'time' it would form a forth concievably 'spacial' dimension. The notion that a 'temporal dimension' as you call it could be conceived as a spacial dimension confuses me.
Here's my special [http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/courses/2008/part-b/b72c72-relativity/b72a-special-relativity-and-electromagnetism/material] and general [http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/courses/2008/part-c/c72b-general-relativity-i/material] relativity notes.stinkychops said:I can accept that, have you got any links?Maze1125 said:The entirety of Relativity is founded on the concept that time is a dimension extremely similar to space. If that concept is wrong, then so is Relativity.stinkychops said:I was also unaware that there was evidence to suggest that if everypoint of a persons movement through what is conceived as 'time' it would form a forth concievably 'spacial' dimension. The notion that a 'temporal dimension' as you call it could be conceived as a spacial dimension confuses me.
Relativity has been tested repeatedly and found to be accurate.
As far as I can tell, not in the same way that you meant it.(So wait, haven't you just agreed with my original point on time just being a measurment of comparitives)