When you can explain the entire mechanism of creation, ie how a being is capable and the exact process that are used to create something with no transfer of energy, or anything observable, we'll talk.
Also, it would be helpful in this conversation of how if you were able to bring up a definition of the 'creator' that made any sense and wasn't inherently meaningless through the use of limitless terms.
We also need to address what precisely you're assuming this creator is, its inherent properties, what it means to say that it exists, how it can exist, and a lot of other things before we can talk creationism in a serious manner.
And of course, observable evidence is the premium for scientific study, so anything you have of that after
you identify precisely what this 'creator' is and its nature, would be helpful. However that is only after we've made sense of what it is you are proposing.