You are wrong in so many ways (which have already been sufficiently pointed out by Bloodstain, so I won't retread old ground). Definitely, the last point is the worst - saying they should be locked up without ever having harmed a child, just to prevent it from maybe happening. Your post is very ignorant.pomfster said:'cuddly razor'
'No, not at all. However, I would say that pedophiles should not be discriminated against unless they act on their desires.
People can't control what their desires are. People can control whether they act on those desires.'
'quote'
Whats right and whats wrong, pedophiles usually have child pornography and other things on their computers, It is just a matter of time before they do act on their desires which is the problem. By letting them live in normal society is delaying the inevitable, you say that we should stop it when they act on the desires but then its to late they may have already brought harm to an innocent child
I'm getting a kick out of all the Internet tough guys in this thread, saying they would 'beat on them with a nailed-plank until they make even Freddy Kruger nauseous' (thank you, Varrdy). Now, not only is it silly to try to act like that in any situation, but it's also hypocritical. Since someone stomps on cats, you would like to murder them in a horribly vicious manner. Just a liiiiitle bit of silliness there.