i have no problem with anyone not watching the video we all have our own thresh holds for this sort of thing, in truth i havnt watched all the video, i dont want to, my girlfriend made me aware of this and it seemed like a responsibility to spread awareness, im kinda linked to this world of computers and such more than she so it seemed like another sphere to affect.
InterAirplay said:
Mr Snuffles said:
I voted 7, it makes me completely rage to see these poor defenceless animals just tortured for no reason other than to let some sick friendless jerk to whack himself off to!
I demand that these people be skinned alive THEMSELVES, have THEIR eye sockets poked out by some woman in stiletto heels, and finally let THEM have their legs crushed, and be trodden on until they die...
They'd probably enjoy that.
OT: We allow people to participate sexually in whatever they like behind closed doors. We do not, however, allow people to harm others or press them into sexual acts against their will simply for pleasure. We take them to court for that. And I see no reason why we shouldexempt defenseless animals who have done nothing wrong. I'm no tree-hugging "love our animal friends" hippy type, I just think this is pure common sense. You know I could watch the most violent and disgusting horror film, but I don't think I can bring myself to watch this video.
I have no problem with anyone not watching the video we all have our own thresh holds for this sort of thing. In truth i havnt watched all the videos, i dont want to> My girlfriend made me aware of this and it seemed like a responsibility to spread awareness, im kinda linked to this world of computers and such more than she so it seemed like another sphere to affect.
The calls to violence are un-helpful though understandable, it is the most basic of human desires when confronted with something that cannot be rationalised to the non participating mind, our ability to hold back from this either through experience or time will i hope enable some of these people to shape their anger into more productive forces than they currently suggest. i myself see this as the basic objective of humanity, to achieve self control.
I know that a paedophile was in most cases molested or had a definable traumatic event in their life thus causing a likely-hood of developing specific fixations, though i am not saying this is always the case. The fact is though if i found out my neice or sister was molested i would not be thinking about the abusers childhood, this is where the state should intervene,the state should be a tool for preserving the victims humanity by stripping the need for revenge and having an effective mix of reform and incarceration, i do not believe in a state that kills. Killing is wrong should be a rule that defines us not a rule we can waver, it is the responsibility of our morality to care more for those who transgress against us than they might for us, it is the lesson we have to teach,it is what keeps us better. We need not be more brutal than those who use force against us or else we justify their violence and lose the innocence of having bloodless hands.
I may sound like a massive hippy now but i try and stick to these views they are all strictly my personal opinion.
the problem is in this case the state doesn't protect our humanity, the state ignores and leaves us impotent, and so we become aggressive, and we lose ourselves.
life forces us into apathy, i would say instead of making violent remarks people comment their disapproval and find soem way of drawing their states governor or w/e (im british i donno) and make sure they are aware of this, it should be illegal i think, make it so .
Im moderately dyslexic i avoid large bodies of text as i am normally slain for it, excuse me.