MacNille said:
I would like to know if the Ak-5 is a good assault-rifle or not (it's the basic Assault Rilfe for the Swedeish army)
Having never fired or handled one myself, I can't comment too heavily. However, from what I do know and could find out, I'll say the following of the basic model.
Ammo-wise, it's a bit outdated. 5.56x45 NATO is a basic rifle-slug, but doesn't have any significant strenghts or weaknesses, aside from what a lighter rounds tend to have: doesn't do too well against targets behind heavy cover (like a thick tree) because once the bullets hits something solid, their trajectory becomes fairly unpredictable;on the other hand, when it hits a something you want dead, the actual body cavity and fragmentation effects and thus damage dealt is slightly better than equally old, heavier rifle rounds.
It simply doesn't matter too much against your average target: a hit from a 5.56x45 is just as deadly as one from a 7.62x39.
Mag capacity is average.
Dimensions: perhaps a bit long in comparison to many other models, but not by much. However, combined with the weight of the weapon (3.9kg without a mag) might make AK-5 a tad unwieldy for urban warfare or enclosed spaces - that's a fairly heavy assault rifle and the weight saving of a smaller caliber ammo doesn't really show. It might help with the overall recoil though, can't say for certain.
All in all, pretty average if perhaps a tad heavy assault rifle based on older principles with standard performance parameters. Nothing to get too exited about, but no glaring faults or flaws either. I naturally can't comment on the ease (or lackthereof) of cleaning and maintaining it, or it's reliability. I am slightly concerned about how the Swedes plan to fight in dense wooden areas with that small bullet and the high changes in trajectory it experiences when it hits anything.