Poll: Ghostly museum image caught on film

[spiral knight]

I really wish the picture was bigger, it's so small that it's hard to tell what it is you are actually looking at. But From experience from working with film all day long with prints, especially Panos. Shadows can sometimes be pulled into the foreground of the picture causing weird shapes to appear.

 

[Jepix]

Could be real, could be photoshoped.
I'm all about probability.
What's the probability for a supernatural afterlife, compared to a museum that pays a photographer to shoop his pics. Hmm-hmmm

 

[Lord_Ascendant]

it looks faked to me but whatever.

 

[manaman]

ive used an image magnifing program i have, and i looks almost human, the head is odd, but i can make out a shoe, legs, torso, and get this, its not male, i can make out protruding breasts

Yeah I call bullshit.

Your right. Call me a total skeptic. Humans are pattern matching, and pattern finding animals. It is even part of intelligence tests, how fast and how accurately you can find patterns. You notice it with "Satan in the explosion" articles. Most people think they are doctored, and to some extent might be (to make the features more noticeable), but origional image was taken and someone said "hey that looks like a dude with horns."

It is the same here. I bet I could point out a swinging dong in the picture and at least one person would say, "You know what, I see that now"

Think clouds in the sky, did that one really look like a bunny to you before or after you girlfriend said it?

 

[JWAN]

well with the picture being that small it's hard to tell.

I do believe in ghosts, but i'm also extremely skeptical. I don't think every ya-hoo who hears a bump in the night is being haunted. But if I see something that seems to defy explanation than I am more than willing to believe that yes, it could be a ghost.

I guess if have to boil it down I would be a 'Cautious Believer'

this^

 

[FaelarLaelither]

There is nothing in this picture to convince me that it is real.

 

[new_age_reject]

I clicked fake, but I think that it is just a trick of the light not a doctored photo.

 

[DerpyDerpyDerp]

I don't believe in ghosts but the "pictures" and "stories" are always fun.

 

[Glerken]

I love that it won't even let you click on the picture to examine it at a size any larger than thumbnail size.

Ya. It's rather lame.

Obvious fake is obvious.
But that could simply because I don't believe in ghosts.

Trick of the light? Bad photoshop? I'm not sure, but not real...

 

[Crazy Elf]

I've seen this sort of thing come out in film before from people that had no capacity to forge such images. I've no doubt that many of these images are real, as the vast majority of them don't end up hitting the press.

 

[dontworryaboutit]

http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/8696/neuralyzer8pb.jpg

It was swamp gas.

 

[Glerken]

Your right. Call me a total skeptic. Humans are pattern matching, and pattern finding animals. It is even part of intelligence tests, how fast and how accurately you can find patterns. You notice it with "Satan in the explosion" articles. Most people think they are doctored, and to some extent might be (to make the features more noticeable), but origional image was taken and someone said "hey that looks like a dude with horns."

It is the same here. I bet I could point out a swinging dong in the picture and at least one person would say, "You know what, I see that now"

Think clouds in the sky, did that one really look like a bunny to you before or after you girlfriend said it?

I agree.
Personally, when I look at the floor on the image on the left, I see two fish in a river. The river going vertically.

And in the image on the right, I see a rocking horse!