Poll: GTA5 Vs. SR3

Recommended Videos

Lunar Templar

New member
Sep 20, 2009
8,221
0
0
Saints Row 2-4

all day, every day.

I getta make my own character, the story's aren't basically ripped off from prime time HBO crime dramas. Your still playing a horrible person, but least The Boss of the 3rd Street Saints seems to enjoy it with a child like glee, and I get a pimped out purple and gold tank in Saints Row (sadly, with no spinning rim option :( ) and a host of other odd and fun weapons.

Mean while GTA all has 'real' weapons >.> and 'real' is going to lose to a 5 foot long dildo bat and a gun that kills people with dubstep, and SUPER POWERS.

Every.
Fucking
Time.

I want fun from my games. GTA does not provide fun. Saints Row does, not only that it makes me laugh. There for, Saints Row is better.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
SR3 was fun. GTA5 was great, though once you finished the story then the world felt dead and empty. I think SR had the fun stuff out side the story. GTA5 had awesome character stuff - but once the character stuff ended, thus the game lost alot of its character.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Really they're both pretty great for their own reasons. SR3 is more silly and intentionally humorous, but that's not to say that GTA5 doesn't have that classic "GTA Humor" like all the other games. One neat thing about SR3 is you can actually co-op story missions, so if you have any friends that also have it they could play with you. I will say that SR3 is a bit easier than GTA5 and the story is a bit shorter as well, however the character customization was very extensive, far more so than in GTA.

Beyond that, they're both sandbox "go crazy" games, so really you just have to decide if you want a smaller playground (the map for SR3 is much smaller than GTA5's) but have more customization options and the ability to get ridiculously powerful vehicles and play a game that tries to be over-the-top and silly? Get SR3. If you want a bigger playground with a game with a more serious and semi-based-in-reality (as in more "believable") story, go with GTA5. One thing I will say about GTA5 is that the heist missions were a lot of fun...too bad there's only 4 or 5 of them throughout the whole game.
 

Harkat283

New member
May 14, 2012
2
0
0
Saints row 3 is a bloody good time and it has moments that will stick with you for ages after finishing it and probably have you go back replay it again at some point in the future. It's so over the top and the characters are balls to the wall crazy yet they made the game so much better where normally I go out of my way to avoid NPC's as they have a nasty habit of annoying me the SR3 NPC's were a joy to be around.

Siding with Saint's Row series kinda makes me sad having played pretty much every iteration of GTA and loving most of them but I feel the series peaked with San Andreas, three and vice city were in there own right fantastic games and then San An came along and combined the whole package and made a fantastic that was a true highlight to the series and i still play today.

A bit thing that put me off V was the multiple playable characters it felt dis jointed every time I switched immersion kinda broke for me. I like investing in one person building them up to where they own everything. Not to say GTA V is a bad game in anyway shape or form it looks great and there is some fun to be had but once it is over you will probably forget it, there are so few stand out points in it and the few that are, are mostly Trevor and they stand out because they are just nuts.
 

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,445
1,174
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
The way that I always viewed it was that in GTA, all you are going to spend your time doing is pissing about, so you might as well play Saints Row and have the tools to do so.

GTA V sure is a pretty game, and GTA IV has a city that really feels alive, but GTA has a more serious tone, and what most people do really doesn't fit with the context of the game.
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,449
0
0
nomotog said:
Try saints row 2. The graphics are a really dated now, but it's the best of the saints row games. (SR2>SR4>SR3) Saints rows big selling point is the character customization. It's bonkers to see all you can customize, but then it gets better. You would expect a game with that much customization to have like a silent say nothing protagonist, but that is so not how it dose it. You talk. You talk a lot.

GTA 5 Looks really pretty. Like really pretty. The world feels really really real. The downside to it is that it doesn't really stick with you. My experience was, I enjoyed playing it, but after I stopped playing I didn't miss it.
^This^
Saints Row 2 rocks, and is my favourite out of them all (all the GTA's and all the Saints Rows)
 
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
Saints Row for me too :) I haven't enjoyed any city sandbox game nearly so much as SR3 and 4. 3 in particular, playing it in co-op is one of my favourite gaming experiences.

GTA: Vice City was the pinnacle of the franchise. A phenomenal city, great cars, great music, wonderful (if cheesy) story and cool characters. San Andreas was very good, but not great. GTA4 was so boring I couldn't play it more than a few hours. And I'm far from the only person to think so, just google "does gta4 ever get better" to see how often this question got asked.

GTA5 is a technical masterpiece and infinitely superior to GTA4, but is populated by vile characters who swear and say "nigga" a lot. But it lost the fun element in exchange for heads exploding, torture minigames and reprehensible behaviour.
 

Evonisia

Your sinner, in secret
Jun 24, 2013
3,256
0
0
DoPo said:
TopazFusion said:
Ten Foot Bunny said:
I'm also considered weird among SR fans because I liked SR4 best of all.
Really? Because I liked 4 the best too.

Superhuman powers? Able to run superhumanly fast and blast everything out of your way? Able to leap tall buildings in a single bound? Yes please, yes please, yes please.
Haven't played SR4 yet, but I loved The Third. From the few gameplay footages that were made available, it looked like they took that mission from one of the DLCs (I think it was The Trouble with Clones) where you get high on Saints Flow and then went nuts with that segment.
I'd say Saints Row IV is only like The Trouble With Clones in the fast running department (which looks nearly the same). The super powers are varied and differ from TTwC, at least to some degree. Plus Saints Row IV lets you recover from being knocked down which was always a downer in the previous games. Press A (or equivalent) and you do a backflip back onto your feet, which is just as awesome as that sounds.
 

an annoyed writer

Exalted Lady of The Meep :3
Jun 21, 2012
1,406
0
0
I've only briefly played GTAV but I've 100% Saints Row 3's base game. It may not be as pretty but I still found Saints Row 3 to be quite a bit more engaging and addictive compared to any GTA I've played, and contrary to some people I actually found Saints Row The Third to be a much more satisfying experience than Saints Row 2. The controls are so much smoother, the game looks a lot better, the traffic density is much thicker and more believable, navigating Steelport feels much more fun than the tangled, shit-colored mess that is Stilwater, the soundtrack is more in-line with my tastes(Junkie XL, The Black Keys, DeadMau5, AND DETHKLOK? FUCK YES!) And while the customization was cut down a decent bit between the two I still prefer how my character and her various rides look and feel in SR3 as opposed to 2. I actually felt disappointed to go through 2 compared to 3 because it really feels like a step down, even though it seemingly has a lot of options that really should make it the better game. A lot more building interiors, more gang customizations, more unique cribs, and a supposedly bigger city. However, it's all in a city that looks shit-brown more than I'd like(seriously, whenever it's nighttime the sky has this baby-shit greenish-greyish-brown look that makes me sick, as seen in the screenshot)


As opposed to Saint's Row 3's more gorgeous color pallate:


I haven't played a whole lot of GTAV, but I can tell you I still like how my controls work and how my character and vehicles responds a lot more in Saints Row 3 as opposed to GTAV. It may just be dumb love talking here, but I still go back to Saints Row 3 more than I ever do any GTA. I'll be getting SR4 soon too, because I really want MOAR.
 

KB13

New member
Oct 3, 2011
54
0
0
Thank you all for your responses!! And based on everyone's comments I will be going the Saints Row route. Saint's Row 4... I need to crawl out of my college induced cave a little more often. I would like to thank you all for keeping this friendly, I've seen way too many of these debates get nasty. Thanks again!
 

Ten Foot Bunny

I'm more of a dishwasher girl
Mar 19, 2014
807
0
0
KB13 said:
Thank you all for your responses!! And based on everyone's comments I will be going the Saints Row route. Saint's Row 4... I need to crawl out of my college induced cave a little more often. I would like to thank you all for keeping this friendly, I've seen way too many of these debates get nasty. Thanks again!
Hope you enjoy it, my friend! :) I played about half an hour of SR4 and pretty much knew it'd rank among my top five games of all time. By the end of the game, that was sealed - it was brilliant from start to finish and easily clinched its spot.

If you can, I'd seriously recommend getting the two story DLCs, Enter the Dominatrix and How the Saints Saved Christmas. The former is one of the best DLCs ever, but not for anyone who's easily offended by in-your-face sexual references, toys, and/or imagery. No, there isn't any nudity, it's just boldly loaded with adult content. The Christmas DLC is perhaps tamer than the core game itself and can certainly be enjoyed by people of all ages and sensibilities.
 

Whateveralot

New member
Oct 25, 2010
953
0
0
Racecarlock said:
GTA V also suffers from explosively mean spirited satire. [...] I get it, facebook is terrible. Not the people who misuse it, no, it's always the fault of the service itself. Hence lifeinvader, a parody of facebook that has the subtlety of a nuke in a small japanese town.
On an entirely different subject here - What I understand of this, is that you say that Facebook is corporately selling the data gathered about it's users, is the fault of the users?

See, Facebook is, other than a platform to spew your entire private life on, a way for Facebook to gather and use that information -big data; raw and processed- and use it for both semi-ethical research [http://www.technologyreview.com/news/528706/facebooks-emotional-manipulation-study-is-just-the-latest-effort-to-prod-users/] and for straight-up commercial use [http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/08/31/new-facebook-policies-sell-your-face-and-whatever-it-infers/] and -of course- to "boost" views for their own on-site advertisements [http://consumerist.com/2014/06/12/facebook-is-now-selling-your-web-browsing-data-to-advertisers/]


But surely, it must be our fault that Facebook is shitting on our privacy. Don't they know the common phrase: "If you're not paying for the product, you are the product"?


Anyway, back to the subject: I choose GTA just for this kind of humour. It's over the top, but they have built a world around it and it works.

Plus, the amount of things you can do is simply huge. That extra year of development has paid off.
 

Racecarlock

New member
Jul 10, 2010
2,497
0
0
Whateveralot said:
Racecarlock said:
GTA V also suffers from explosively mean spirited satire. [...] I get it, facebook is terrible. Not the people who misuse it, no, it's always the fault of the service itself. Hence lifeinvader, a parody of facebook that has the subtlety of a nuke in a small japanese town.
On an entirely different subject here - What I understand of this, is that you say that Facebook is corporately selling the data gathered about it's users, is the fault of the users?

See, Facebook is, other than a platform to spew your entire private life on, a way for Facebook to gather and use that information -big data; raw and processed- and use it for both semi-ethical research [http://www.technologyreview.com/news/528706/facebooks-emotional-manipulation-study-is-just-the-latest-effort-to-prod-users/] and for straight-up commercial use [http://www.forbes.com/sites/anthonykosner/2013/08/31/new-facebook-policies-sell-your-face-and-whatever-it-infers/] and -of course- to "boost" views for their own on-site advertisements [http://consumerist.com/2014/06/12/facebook-is-now-selling-your-web-browsing-data-to-advertisers/]
Well that's why I don't constantly tell it details of my private life. I don't tell it more than it needs to know. I just use it to keep in contact with people.
 

CannibalCorpses

New member
Aug 21, 2011
987
0
0
Shit...i was too late!

Saint's row 3 is utter shite. A game where when fully upgraded you can only die if you are leaving a vehicle when it explodes is no game at all...challenge? FUCK THAT! Our players don't want challenge, they want to have god mode without having to 'bother' cheating. That said, it was ok until i got the invulnerable to everything upgrades, then i might aswell have watched a let's play and pretended i'd played it :p

GTA5 is another notch in a long line of heavily detailed games with depths within depths...but quite a bit easier than it's predecessors (it has modern game syndrome i.e lowest-common-denominator cancer). The story is good, the gameplay is easy and yet hard to master, the music is terrible (just like a real radio) and the city is full of twats (like a real city).

If i do a comparison...

GTA5 gave me well over 100 hours of gameplay with lots of replaying to gold all the missions aswell as all the random side mission stuff. The alternate options on the heists gave me a second full playthrough just to see what i could change.

SR3 took me around 30 hours to fully complete with very little replay value and no reason to dick around (I was godlike after all, no point starting fights that are impossible for me to lose).

One last thing...Saint's row 4 came out way too fast for my liking...it's almost as if they don't even try anymore...and the game suffers for it
 

timeformime

New member
Jul 27, 2012
60
0
0
It's not necessarily SR3's fault for not trying the same things, and being made two years earlier, but SR3 was much shallower and shorter-lived in my memory than GTA V, which is R*'s crown jewel as far as I'm concerned. It was a one-two-knockout from Red Dead to Max Payne 3 to GTA V, three excellent games for very unique reasons. Maybe it's because I genuinely love crime drama, satire, and the GTA series already, so V just hits all the right notes.

Some of the satire is just mean spirited and hits as subtly as a club, I will give you guys that, but come on, there's still some hilarious dialogue in there. You have to admit, if there's any place in consumer America that deserves this kind of skewering for its general absurdity, it's freaking LA, the seat of Hollywood. There are plenty of wonderful things about it, but quite a few moronic things that go unsaid. It's not the best satire in the world, but it's an interesting exercise.

Of course the density of this world and the breadth of what you can do is just absurd, which is really why people (outside the games industry) can play GTA for years on end and will do the same with this one. I took an hour long bike ride once up Mt. Chilead just because I could.
 

Samael Barghest

New member
Mar 5, 2014
145
0
0
I'm going to have to go with SR. I have yet to finish a single game but I have always found myself having fun while playing it. Which is something R* seems to have forgotten to include in their games while trying to write a dramatic story that is actually pretty dull. You can't make me feel sorry for the wacko murderer when he's finally put down when all he's been doing is killing people and wrecking their shit. R* got it right with Vice City and San Andreas (hell Red Dead Redemption was fun as hell and had a good story) but GTA 4&5 has seriously been lacking.
 

j4c0b1

New member
Jun 9, 2014
17
0
0
My vote goes for saints row.

I can't remember anything that happened in the story of GTA4, and iv not even been able to finish GTA5 (i'v only not completed 3 other games in the last 10 years). The world, stories, and characters of the newer GTA are just entirely bland and forgettable.

Saints row on the other hand had much more memorable characters, and was willing to go increasingly mental, while GTA tries to go more realistic and boring.
 

OldDirtyCrusty

New member
Mar 12, 2012
700
0
0
Gta5 offers way more and i'll never understand that this game feels empty for some. No other openworld game features the insane amount of details and features.

SR3 is the most dissapointing game i've ever bought.
If you want to play a badass gangster go get the second SR. It's stuffed with double the content and feels way more polished than SR3. SR 2 has the best character and clothing editor. The side activities are fun and steelport is a great place to roam around. Pedestrian placement makes sense since not every place needs to be overrun by gimps, hookers or mascots. There are three campaigns compared to SR 3 with having like 4 or 5 grand cool looking main missions while the other missions are poorly disguised side activities.

SR 4 is a fun superhero game but it gets boring way to fast. Maybe wait for the goty edition if it's not to late. At least i liked it way more than SR 3.
 

DataSnake

New member
Aug 5, 2009
467
0
0
an annoyed writer said:
However, it's all in a city that looks shit-brown more than I'd like(seriously, whenever it's nighttime the sky has this baby-shit greenish-greyish-brown look that makes me sick, as seen in the screenshot)


As opposed to Saint's Row 3's more gorgeous color pallate:

There's actually a mod [http://www.saintsrowmods.com/forum/threads/enhanced-graphics-shinobu-fix-for-saints-row-2-beta-feedback.6574/] to make the color palette more SR3-ish. It's pretty good.