Poll: Hey Bethesda fans, Elder Scrolls or Fallout?

Recommended Videos

SoranMBane

New member
May 24, 2009
1,175
0
0
That depends; are we counting the Fallout games Bethesda didn't make? Because while I generally prefer the Fallout series, the good Fallout games weren't even made by Bethesda; they were made by Black Isle and Obsidian. But just judging Bethesda's one Fallout game against all of the Elder Scrolls games, the Elder Scrolls would wind up coming out on top.
 

wintercoat

New member
Nov 26, 2011
1,691
0
0
Fallout. I'm getting royally sick of generic medieval fantasy settings. That and the combat is less boring.
 

Popadoo

New member
May 17, 2010
1,024
0
0
Fallout, I just had way more fun with it. The combat is better. It isn't fantastic, but it's better than TES.
Also, it has a great dark humor that I rarely see in other games.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,361
3
43
So does that include New Vegas (for which Bethesda's only involvement was publishing and QA)? I loved it, but hated Fallout 3.

If New Vegas is included, I prefer Fallout. If not, then Elder Scrolls.
 

Moriim

New member
Jul 12, 2010
40
0
0
Jamash said:
Even the inhabited areas were a mess. I understand that people's morale may be low and their motivation may be lacking, but that's no excuse for not cleaning and living in filth.
So much this. I have trouble immersing myself in the world when it's so ridiculously over the top with the apocalypse stuff. It's been, what, 200+ years since the nuclear war in that game? And not a single damn clean surface in sight. I'm not asking for Pine-Sol'd floors, but damn at least clear the random crap out of your house so you don't attract Radroaches or some crap.

TES has its issues, but I can get drawn into the setting much more easily than Fallout. Which is strange, considering Fallout is at least partially set in reality and should be more relatable.

/shrug
 

ReservoirAngel

New member
Nov 6, 2010
3,779
0
0
Ooh, dead heat. Interesting...

My vote went to the Elder Scrolls. I just like fantasy settings more than nuclear wasteland settings, it's as simple as that.
 

laggyteabag

Scrolling through forums, instead of playing games
Legacy
Oct 25, 2009
3,447
1,181
118
UK
Gender
He/Him
TES

Fallout had potential, but it failed on so may levels for me. Unless its modded, I cant think of any reason to buy it, I at least enjoyed the vanilla Skyrim/Oblivion.
 

xplosive59

New member
Jul 20, 2009
969
0
0
I love the atmosphere and characters of Fallout much more, also I love the mutilations, so satisfying!

Still love Elder Scrolls though.
 

Kungfu_Teddybear

Member
Legacy
Jan 17, 2010
2,712
0
1
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Elder Scrolls all the way, I love the Fallout games as well, but I just love fantasy settings.
 

RatRace123

Elite Member
Dec 1, 2009
6,649
0
41
Elder Scrolls.

If only because I consider Skyrim to be the best Bethesda game released yet. If they make another Fallout game and it's better than Skyrim, my vote would shift over to Fallout, as I find that setting more interesting than TES setting.
 

BaronUberstein

New member
Jul 14, 2011
384
0
0
I've played Skyrim and Fallout New Vegas...and I'm having MUCH more fun in New Vegas. The storyline is somehow much more interesting to me.

That and you can actually kill people. Don't like somebody in Skyrim? Too bad, they're needed for a QUEST. New Vegas? Start shooting, you'll learn you failed that quest AFTER they're dead. :D
 

Bvenged

New member
Sep 4, 2009
1,202
0
0
50/50 at a 34 split after I cast my vote. Also, are we talking about B Game Studios (dev), or B Softworks (pub)?

I'll approach this as a question about unmodded vanilla versions of Softworks' two most popular franchises.

'Fallout series' versus 'TES series'?
TES wins.

Single titles against each other?
Fallout 3 wins against Skyrim, Morrowind and Oblivion, but only just. Fallout: New Vegas, however, is their worst game so far.

Basically it boils down to this:
xplosive59 said:
I love the atmosphere and characters of Fallout much more...

Still love Elder Scrolls though.
TizzytheTormentor said:
...both are different in what you are getting.
Elder Scrolls gives you a fantasy epic with tons of adventuring and exploring large mountains and ancient ruins from a lost civilization with many classes to choose from.

Fallout lets you explore the wastes and ruins of the old world trying to find weapons and ammo to survive (gets easier when ammo is thrown at you) with quests to follow and watching humanity trying to survive (Fallout 3 did this well) or seeing how humanity has risen from the ashes and rebuilding (F:NV did this well)

I am a fan of both and look forward to Fallout 4 (hope they pull off all the stops to piss of purist fans and bring in more new fans, the whining would be delightful)
Xplosive and Tizzy nailed it on the head, your question is a bit vague and there are too many differences. It's like trying to ask me if I prefer Halo or Battlefield multiplayer, when they're in almost completely different leagues within the same genre and I find equal entertainment in both.
 

Kroxile

New member
Oct 14, 2010
543
0
0
Fallout because its the only game that has its setting, gameplay, and lore.

Elder Scrolls is pretty much Sword & Sorcery title no. 10789034098 just with a big world.
 

teebeeohh

New member
Jun 17, 2009
2,896
0
0
elder scrolls
the only fallout game actually made by bethesda was 3 and that one sucked.
 

BENZOOKA

This is the most wittiest title
Oct 26, 2009
3,919
0
0
Fallout.

Atmosphere, setting, combat (don't like to use VATS though). And there's just something that rubs me the wrong way about Elder Scrolls, even though I prefer fantasy over sci-fi any day of the week.
 

Sean Hollyman

New member
Jun 24, 2011
5,175
0
0
I've only played Oblivion and Skyrim of TES. I hated Oblivion, but love Skyrim.
I love both Fallout 3 and New Vegas.


Fallout by far.
 

Janus Vesta

New member
Mar 25, 2008
550
0
0
Elder Scrolls if it's made by Bethesda, Fallout if it's not. Fallout 3 was the weakest of the not shit Fallouts. Brotherhood of Steel never happened.
 

Berithil

Maintenence Man of the Universe
Mar 19, 2009
1,597
0
0
I honestly think the Elder Scrolls games are better, but I personally enjoy the Fallout games more. I just enjoy the retro post apocalyptic wasteland, while radios are playing old 40s like music. The world itself just appeals to me more.

Captcha: Lo and Behold. Oh, captcha, you.....
 
Aug 20, 2011
240
0
0
Fallout because TES is horribly designed. I had fun exploring Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim, but when it comes time to make progress in the game things turn to shit.

First, the story is laughably generic fantasy. I don't even wanna hear about their supposedly brilliant fourth wall breaking narrative. It's a gimmick to explain save files, nothing more. Not only that, but you wouldn't even know about it unless you read through the thousands of books scattered around those games. I always want to read every book I come across, because I don't like to think I'm missing out on anything in a game, but Jesus, they're so fucking boring. If I have to read the equivalent of War and Peace in terrible fan fiction style history tomes just to understand what is honestly, a very simplistic story, count me the fuck out.

Second, level and mission design in TES are some of the dullest in gaming. Skyrim was a bit of an improvement over Oblivion's identical procedural dungeons, but let's be honest, Skyrim's dungeons got real boring after the first 20 or so. If I had a penny for every Draugr I killed, well, I could buy a better game. In Fallout 3 and New Vegas, almost every scenario you ran itno was unique in some way. I also liked that Fallout's quests tended to be focused more on interesting character interaction. There were a handful of interesting quests that I came across in Skyrim, but mostly it was just "kill all the Draugr/vampires/Dwemmer/bandits/Imperials".

Third, I like Fallout's sense of context. By that I mean, in Fallout 3, I really felt like I was part of that world. I consider the intro to Fallout 3 one of the best in gaming. In New Vegas, I really felt like I had different relationships with each faction. In Skyrim, I never even bothered to join the Stormcloaks or the Empire, because neither of them are in the least bit sympathetic. Moral complexity shouldn't be about making everyone bad so much as making everyone understandable. Fallout got this. As horrible as the Legion seemed at first, once you got to know Caesar and some of the other leaders, you can understand what they're trying to accomplish with their brutality. And that was the most extreme example. The Boomers, The Khans, Mr. House, and The Brotherhood of Steel all had legitimate reasons for fighting, and were all sympathetic. Skyrim's pointless civil war and soulless NPCs just made me want the dragons to take the place back and roast the entire population.

tl;dr, I like Fallout's more tightly structured narrative over TES sandbox style gameplay. I like fewer, unique scenarios over tons of generic scenarios. Depth over width, I guess.