EA honestly did not deserve it last year. Comparing the incompetent schemes of EA to the life-ruining practices of BoA was like comparing a gas-station robbery to the Katyn Massacre.
Actually, this strikes me as a pretty good way to get them to rethink their general attitude. Of course, EA completely ignored it last time with a flippant comment, instead of considering the fact that their customers and potential customers dislike them enough to concertedly vote them to the top of a poll which, in reality, they shouldn't be within 100 feet of.hazabaza1 said:They're a shitty company but nowhere near the worst. Stuff like this along with metacritic bombing are some of the many reasons why gamers still have the reputation of being immature idiots.
Activision were lucky. They have WoW and CoD, they can do handstands all day and still turn in 9 digit annual profits. And they didn't do it from being particularly good or smart either. They managed to drive away almost all of the staff who initially created CoD and treated their customers like crud. They strip mined the music game industry to destruction and so far their business strategy involves finding new ways for CoD players to give them money.TheJesus89 said:EA is the worst game company, as far as I'm concerned.
Plummeting stocks mean their much criticized business practices are failing completely, and it's pretty obvious that gamers are more than displeased.
Activision follows a similar business practice, but are incredibly successful. Activision has made smarter business decisions, better acquisitions, and better use of their IPs.
Personally, I'd rather see Activision crumble. However, EA is quantifiably less successful, so is therefor the "worst" game company.
As far as other companies outside of gaming, who knows. All I know is that EA has consistently under-performed and delivered products that have either been sub-par or not functioning at all.
More accurately, it was not Activision who bought Blizzard or arranged the merger; it was their parent company Vivendi Universal, who also rolled Sierra Entertainment into the mix.BrotherRool said:I mean I guess Activision were clever to have the money to buy up Blizzard...*snip*
The others on the list may affect our lives, the environment, etc, but they're taking one of the very few methods of escape we have from this miserable existence, one of the few means of forgetting the shit we're mired in day by day, and leading the pack of fucking corporations bent on turning it into just one more capitalistic perversion. Turning an outlet from the world into one more corrosive, soul-grinding, money-means-all aspect of this unending nightmare that the free market has made the world.
It's the same as if a corporation were to invent a machine that blocks the everyday person from sleeping, and forced you to jump through hoops and be nickle-and-dimed for a few hours of respite from the droning, pointless days that you must endure for the rest of your life.
That's why EA is worse.
SimCity put a new lease of hate.sabercrusader said:Worst company in America? No, not really. They're bad, but not that bad. Worst game company? Certainly in my opinion they are. They didn't deserve worst company in America last year, even after the whole Mass Effect 3 ending fiasco, so why this year?
Depriving people of the only form of entertainment that hasn't been completely destroyed by big business in an era of bread and circuses is a bad thing.razer17 said:If someone genuinely believes EA is the worst company in the US, they are daft. I mean seriously, dangerously daft. There are companies with much bigger consequences that EA's somewhat anti-consumer policies.
Are you serious? I'm not trying to be insulting here, but you have no sense of scale. The fact that EA is even on the list is embarrassing.gyrobot said:/snip