Credge said:
The entire debate is hypocritical. People will rant and rave over movies, music, and games but won't even shrug when it comes to literature, pictures, and art.
If you're against piracy, ask yourself to what extent. If you're against it all, then great, you're not a hypocrite. If you're against some of it, then great, you're a hypocrite. If you're for all of it, then great, you're not a hypocrite.
That's because literature, pictures, and art are generally not centers of piracy and are already handled well by our copyright laws.
I don't get what's so hypocritical about wanting to play abandonware. Granted, no one has a right to play a game just because they don't have access to it (or don't have the money), but with abandonware there is no official legal route to buy it. With most games, and most piracy, people are pirating *new* games. So, if your goal is to put money in the pockets of the developers when you can, how is it not logical to support abandonware but decry piracy of new games?
I think you've got it all wrong. Just because someone is an extremist doesn't mean that they aren't a hypocrite.
I also find it only slightly hypocritical how people will rant and rave about how piracy is ruining the gaming industry and then they'll go out to Gamestop, sell off their used games, and buy a bunch more used games and repeat this process again and again and again not stopping to think for a moment that those ARE actual lost sales.
It's a fairly laugh worthy double standard. People think they are justified in their actions because they payed for it while complaining to people about how those SCOUNDREL PC gamers are ruining gaming by pirating! For shame! How could they do such a thing?
Firstly, if you pirate a game you get it for free. Though you save money, you're at least as likely to pirate the next game as to buy it. If you buy a game from someone else, THEY get your money, and it improves their purchasing power. They can then use that money to buy another game, perhaps even one by the same developer. Thus, in one way it allows the used buyer to contribute at a different price point to the economy, for something of lower quality. (scratched disk or whatnot)
Secondly, assuming that they ARE lost sales, this has been going on since money was invented. Ever buy a used car? Go to a yard sale? The right to resell what you own is a well established one, why should it be different for games on a CD or DVD? If I buy all my cars used, am I causing lost sales and stealing from all those manufacturers and companies which made all that stuff? Should I always buy a new house rather than an old one?! People seem to have coped fine so far with used markets, why get in a tizzy about them now?
Except all piracy on the PC has done has moved terrible game developers away from the PC to consoles. Now you guys get to put up with the plethora of shovelware that we've had to suffer through for ages! Yay for you!
Good games get pirated, bad games get pirated. The idea that somehow pirating *selectively* hurts bad games is laughable. It could only happen in a world where most pirates try before they buy. but how can you possibly think that this could be the case? Indeed, isn't there a strong incentive to pirate the good games because, well, they're good games?