"Naturally-occurring blonde hair outside of Scandinavia is uncommon, but it's completely normal."Dizchu said:Guys if you're so freaked out by the word "cis" sounding like "cyst", do you also refuse to acknowledge that you belong to the species "homo sapiens" because "homo" is in the name?
"Normal" is not synonymous with "average" or "common" though. Naturally-occurring blonde hair outside of Scandinavia is uncommon, but it's completely normal. There are plenty of things that are uncommon that are completely normal.MrFalconfly said:Well, seeing as "normal" is synonymous with "average", it's a pretty common comparison.
If you really want to make "normal" a dirty word, then why not make it THE dirty word that it is?
Normal means boring. It means average. It means you disappear into the background.
"Normal" implies that everything is fine, there's nothing to worry about. When you describe a person as "average" you are implying that they are dull and uninteresting. When you describe a person as "normal" you don't necessarily mean that they are boring or unremarkable, you're saying that they don't pose any threat and that they are able to function in society to a reasonable standard. When a cisgender person calls themselves "normal" to differentiate from transgender people, the implication is that transgender people are inherently flawed or fail to live up to the standards of everyone else.
Calling someone "normal" when what you mean is "average" is like calling someone "strange" when what you mean is "unique", but I'm sure you're aware that while the two words may have similarities, they have very different connotations.
Now we are mixing statistically normal (which most definitely IS synonymous with average), with biologically normal (which could be interpreted as "nothing harmful").
If we have to use the word "normal" in conjunction with trans people, and people who aren't straight, and we've already agreed that there isn't any biological harm done to the species, so any biological norm is besides the point, we're left with the statistical normal.
And statistically transpeople aren't strictly speaking "normal".
According to some statistics only about 0.3% of the US population identify as transgendered
( http://www.marieclaire.com/culture/g3065/transgender-facts-figures/ )
However, since (just like with gay people) most transgender people probably are still in some kind of closet, I'm going to assume that only 10% have actually come out of the closet, but that still only gets us up to 3%.
3% isn't a whole lot. However, as I see it, it's 3% who have one hell of an ace in the hole when it comes to make themselves interesting. Of all the friends I've made in my life, those who I've had the most interesting talks with have always been the ones on the fringes of what's considered normal (statistically). People who are gay, or bi, people who has some kind of kink. Hell I also have some kind of knack for befriending people who are completely opposed to me politically (which is where I usually end up on the fringe).
EDIT:
But hey, I'm fine with using "boring" instead of normal, if you don't like me using the normal.