Poll: http://www.conservapedia.com - people really agree with this?

Antlers

New member
Feb 23, 2008
323
0
0
If the 'real' definition of an atheist makes me an agnostic then it's time to overhaul the whole name-system.
 

Lunar Shadow

New member
Dec 9, 2008
653
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
Skeleon said:
Eisenfaust said:
But you still haven't really answered the question... why make it worth it if you'll never ever remember it again... if all you do when you die is sit in the ground a rot, whats the point of doing anything while you're alive? Anyone who remembers anything you did will end up just like you, and eventually no one will remember anything about you...
There are other things to look forward to besides a questionable afterlife.
There's joy in life. There are goals you set for yourself, people to interact with and love, children to raise and educate. How is it so difficult to accept that people like living for living's sake? Life is a beautiful thing, a one-time chance, one that I wouldn't want to pass up. As I said many times on these forums before, to me, there's no intrinsic meaning of life. But we can find our own.

Oh, and something will remain of you. Whether it's even a mention in a book somewhere (or something grander perhaps?), your kids and grand kids or maybe just the memory of you in somebody else's mind. Everybody leaves an impact on this world and there's such a thing as a legacy one might want to leave behind, however small.
OK, there's joy in life, enjoy it... I'm not trying to stop you from doing that, i'm simply asking... why do you bother? whats it in aid of? and so what if others remember you? they'll just die eventually as well anyway... and "Living is awesome, we've only got one chance so let's make it kick ass" isn't really an answer... I'm asking why bother? why must it kick arse if its ultimately meaningless? every time I've brought this up, everyone's knee-jerk reaction has been "we only have one chance. we should live a good life". I ask them "but why bother?" and they just repeat themselves... its an illogical argument... the hell is the point?!
Well, Atheists bother because they believe that this is the only chance they get to live, thus they enjoy the one life they have. Is that really hard to understand? (I am Buddhist btw, so I am very much in the same boat)
 

Sovvolf

New member
Mar 23, 2009
2,341
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
I actually reckon that most religious people are actually stronger for it, working towards something (shutup) rather than thinking "well there's no point, so i'll do whatever". sigh... i just don't get athiests... and none of you have particularly helped... CONGRATS!
???, Atheists haven't helped ?? Charles Darwin was an Atheist and he discovered the theory of evolution and in turn as helped us understand creatures and how they adapted and behaved which lead to learning how to anatomy a whole lot better and learning how to cure a lot of what at that time were know as incurable deceases, Atheist figured out that people were actually being cured but they had taken ill, Atheists realised that the people they were burning, hanging and drowning were not actually witches. I could go on about this for ever.

Edit: Ho and it's not Atheists that see no point to life, your talking about nihilists completely different. Personally I'd say I'm Agnostic, I don't know if there is or isn't a God, I just personally don't give a shit.
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
ziggybogidou said:
I came across this Conservative, pro-creationism wiki recently and was amazed to discover that it has so many users, when it clearly avoids facts and twists the truth just to make it's articles fit in with the conservative, creationist view. Now I have nothing against having your own beliefs but it certianly surprised me that so many people can beleive that athiesm is the "denial of the existance of God". I was worried when I looked at their article on evoltion: the first thing i saw was a huge picture of Hitler. And on the front page there were pictures linking Burack Obama to communism.
So my question is this: do any of you agree with these views? and if so why?
Strange... Since Hitler was a strong believing christian :/
 

Eisenfaust

Two horses in a man costume
Apr 20, 2009
679
0
0
Sovvolf said:
Eisenfaust said:
I actually reckon that most religious people are actually stronger for it, working towards something (shutup) rather than thinking "well there's no point, so i'll do whatever". sigh... i just don't get athiests... and none of you have particularly helped... CONGRATS!
???, Atheists haven't helped ?? Charles Darwin was an Atheist and he discovered the theory of evolution and in turn as helped us understand creatures and how they adapted and behaved which lead to learning how to anatomy a whole lot better and learning how to cure a lot of what at that time were know as incurable deceases, Atheist figured out that people were actually being cured but they had taken ill, Atheists realised that the people they were burning, hanging and drowning were not actually witches. I could go on about this for ever.
i was talking about with this question i'm posing, not in life in general... *slow clap*

Lunar Shadow said:
Well, Atheists bother because they believe that this is the only chance they get to live, thus they enjoy the one life they have. Is that really hard to understand? (I am Buddhist btw, so I am very much in the same boat)
it wasn't so much that i don't understand that they want to live a full life and enjoy it, blah blah blah, it was that i was questioning they're motives behind it... my ultimate point was "you won't remember, so why bother?" i just makes more logical sense to me that they wouldn't worry about it... but i can't know because i'm not an athiest so i can't really see it from their perspective...

WHICH IS WHY I ASKED THE DAMN QUESTION IN THE FIRST PLACE! (sorry lunar, thats not yelling at you...)
 

Lunar Shadow

New member
Dec 9, 2008
653
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
Sovvolf said:
Eisenfaust said:
I actually reckon that most religious people are actually stronger for it, working towards something (shutup) rather than thinking "well there's no point, so i'll do whatever". sigh... i just don't get athiests... and none of you have particularly helped... CONGRATS!
???, Atheists haven't helped ?? Charles Darwin was an Atheist and he discovered the theory of evolution and in turn as helped us understand creatures and how they adapted and behaved which lead to learning how to anatomy a whole lot better and learning how to cure a lot of what at that time were know as incurable deceases, Atheist figured out that people were actually being cured but they had taken ill, Atheists realised that the people they were burning, hanging and drowning were not actually witches. I could go on about this for ever.
i was talking about with this question i'm posing, not in life in general... *slow clap*

Lunar Shadow said:
Well, Atheists bother because they believe that this is the only chance they get to live, thus they enjoy the one life they have. Is that really hard to understand? (I am Buddhist btw, so I am very much in the same boat)
it wasn't so much that i don't understand that they want to live a full life and enjoy it, blah blah blah, it was that i was questioning they're motives behind it... my ultimate point was "you won't remember, so why bother?" i just makes more logical sense to me that they wouldn't worry about it... but i can't know because i'm not an athiest so i can't really see it from their perspective...

WHICH IS WHY I ASKED THE DAMN QUESTION IN THE FIRST PLACE! (sorry lunar, thats not yelling at you...)
Well, that's the point, we won't remember it. Thus we enjoy it while we can. Because of the belief that nothing is awaiting them Atheists are motivated by the fact that this life is all that they have and because they won't remember it is why they are motivated to enjoy it.
 

Skeleon

New member
Nov 2, 2007
5,410
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
i... was making a joke... and i wasn't trying to convince you to change your ways, i was simply asking a question... getting someone to clear it up...
Well, I tried, but I don't know how else to explain it.

i actually reckon that most religious people are actually stronger for it, working towards something (shutup) rather than thinking "well there's no point, so i'll do whatever."
But that's simply not true. Atheists have goals in life. In life, not after life. We're just as motivated to work to better ourselves as any other normal human being.
We don't think "there's no point" which I tried to make clear several times.
As somebody else said, you're confusing atheists with nihilists.
 

Cakes

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,036
0
0
Graustein said:
While you are correct in that agnosticism is "we can't know either way", that is not deism. Deism is the belief in a non-interventionist higher power. One form of deism is a belief that "God created the universe, set up the laws of physics, and then pressed the 'go' button", but that's hardly the only interpretation.

I know this because I am an agnostic deist.
Dammit, you just shattered my entire universe.

Back on the topic of Eisenfaust, what the hell man? The only answer they can possibly give you is "We don't care if there's no afterlife, we live for the moment" but you just go in circles with "No...that's not...a good answer...atheists...are cowards..." What do you want them to say?
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
Conservapedia, or as I like to call it "Old Faithful" hasn't run afowl by making this declaration. Sounds pretty spot on to me, no reason to argue semantics. Besides, isn't this the sentiment of the "public-at-large"? If that's the case, I would say that takes precedent over a Webster definition. Just like how everyone who is against gay marriage is "homophobic". Definitions don't hold as much water as public opinion.
 

Julianking93

New member
May 16, 2009
14,715
0
0
Atheism is just the disbelief in God, Gods, Goddesses, or any deity.

It's not denial if it doesn't exist.

I seriously don't believe how people are quick to discredit rumors of Aliens, Big Foot, Lochness Monster, and the Chuppacabra, yet they go and worship a fucking fairy tale supernatural being.

It's like in Children of the Corn and how they believe in "The Provider." It's the same as any other religion (apart from the sacrificing) They all believe in some all knowing being that watches over everything. I don't understand how people believe in it. It's the same as believing in Santa Clause or the Easter Bunny.

Fuck, the Easter Bunny is more believable than God.
 

Cakes

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,036
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
I actually reckon that most religious people are actually stronger for it, working towards something (shutup) rather than thinking "well there's no point, so i'll do whatever". sigh... i just don't get athiests... and none of you have particularly helped... CONGRATS!
You seem to be under the impression all atheists think "there's no point". You are wrong, and I don't think you quite understand what it is you're arguing about.

Eisenfaust said:
it wasn't so much that i don't understand that they want to live a full life and enjoy it, blah blah blah, it was that i was questioning they're motives behind it... my ultimate point was "you won't remember, so why bother?" i just makes more logical sense to me that they wouldn't worry about it... but i can't know because i'm not an athiest so i can't really see it from their perspective...
The motive is to have as much kick-assedry in one lifetime as possible. It doesn't have to last forever to be worth it, but I'm sure you'll just say that's not an answer, make some vague reference to a philosopher you know, and how atheists are idiots or something.

Now, here's a question for you: If you've got an afterlife to look forward to, that is so magnificent and grand that your current life will hardly matter, why not just snuff it and get right to it? Why bother with this life at all?
 

Antlers

New member
Feb 23, 2008
323
0
0
chronobreak said:
Just like how everyone who is against gay marriage is "homophobic". Definitions don't hold as much water as public opinion.
Are you implying that isn't true?
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
Antlers said:
Are you implying that isn't true?
Not to derail the thread, but yes, that is exactly what I said. Not everyone who is against gay marriage is afraid or feels contempt toward homosexuals. Frankly, there isn't even anything to argue, because it would be incredibly hard to prove millions upon millions of people are homophobic, unless somebody can read the minds of all the proponents of our standard marriage system.

The point I was trying to get across, however, is you can argue all day about a dictionary definiton of a word, but what matters most is what the general public percieves a word to mean.
 

ArcWinter

New member
May 9, 2009
1,013
0
0
Eisenfaust said:
I keep thinking, discussing with people, musing over... why is it that if atheists believe that there is absolutely nothing, WHATSOEVER after this life, they are still alive? I'm simply wondering, not ordering you all to go out and commit suicide (please don't)... but if nothing you do here matters, why do any of it? why deal with the pain? etc, etc... seriously someone give me a decent answer...

I eventually came to the, perhaps misguided, opinion that because of this, all atheists are either idiots, cowards, or not really athiest...

again... please don't commit suicide...!
Uh what. Suicide is for the weak.

I can't talk for others, but I have devised a system in which I simply enjoy existing - this allows me to be extremely happy while others are normally happy, and be less depressed when someone else would be weeping their eyes out. The average effects are akin to being slightly high/drunk, because I am pretty much never sad.

So this "pain" you are talking about does not exist to me, specifically because, not in spite of, that nothing matters. Nothing matters, so why not be happy? No reason to be sad.

Because of this, I have come to the conclusion that all of humanity are idiots or cowards, sometimes both.
 

somekindarobot

New member
Jul 29, 2009
234
0
0
Ah, Conservapedia, once again adding evidence to my thesis that conservative can be funny, but only if they're not trying. For extra fun, try this experiment. On one tab/window open Wikipedia, and on the other Conservapedia. Now, think of something that is not at all politically charged. Here, I'll help: Birds, Igneous Rock, Tungsten, etc. Now enter those things into both encyclopedias. While Wikipedia probably has a respectable amount of information, Conservapedia, if it has anything at all, will have a laughably terse entry. You'll be luck if you get more than a paragraph.
 

chronobreak

New member
Sep 6, 2008
1,865
0
0
somekindarobot said:
Now enter those things into both encyclopedias. While Wikipedia probably has a respectable amount of information, Conservapedia, if it has anything at all, will have a laughably terse entry. You'll be luck if you get more than a paragraph.
Well, obviously. We're talking different sized userbases and different themes. If you expect Conservapedia to tell you all about tectonic plates, you may have a few screws loose, right?