I came up with my own variant on this, but I placed a sexual attraction as one born from a significantly high amount of attraction to a person. So you can be physically attracted to someone without being sexually attracted (like a heterosexual male is physically attracted to other men in that they find people who look nicer more attractive, just not enough to arouse sexual desires). Am I making sense?Aureliano said:(Note: I actually believe this next one is true)
5) Everybody is attracted to some degree or another to any human they have any interest at all in. As in: Jeff seems cool, I should talk to him. Or literally any feeling about your teachers at school, or that annoying girl who talks too much. That is actually what your interest in somebody MEANS: that you want to have sex with them in some way or another. The result is that, practically, men are probably exactly as gay as women are, but it's easier for women to act on their homosexual desires for the above reasons.
Okay, basically think of it like this, everyone is attracted or repulsed to everyone else they ever see/meet/whatever on a physical and social level. A high enough collective attraction to a person creates a sexual desire for that person (the amount of attractio needed depends on the strength of the attracted person's sex drive). People who are heterosexual find the psychological and physical aspects commonly found in members of the opposite sex to be fairly attractive, while finding psychological and physical traits of same-sex people to be less attractive.
So yeah, similar idea, except I have sexual desire set as the product of attraction, not the source of attraction (though from an evolutionary perspective, the non-sexual attractions may be a preferred trait because it better allows for reproduction).