Poll: If we could make Jurassic Park, should we?

Recommended Videos

Leemaster777

New member
Feb 25, 2010
3,310
0
0
So, I want to comment on something about this topic. Some people have questioned the scientific purpose of cloning dinosaurs. "Why should we do this? What is there to gain?"

Personally, I'm of the opinion that ALL scientific progress has merit, even if it isn't immediately apparent what it is.

Think about it for a second. At first glance, the space program doesn't seem like it has alot of practical applications. And it most certainly didn't seem that way when it first began. But the space program has given us loads and loads of incredibly useful inventions.

Case in point: Were it not for the space program, you would not be reading the words I am writing right now. Without the space program, we wouldn't have man-made satelites. And without those, no instant information age. Was the internet the original intent of the space program? Of course not. But the progress achieved THROUGH it gave us tons of wonderful, wonderful things.

So, even if it isn't apparent now, technological advances brought about by the research of dinosaurs could be monumental.

Just thought I'd throw that out there.
 

Imthatguy

New member
Sep 11, 2009
587
0
0
Hornet0404 said:
Imthatguy said:
Ehh most posters are forgetting that most dinosaurs where small also just don't make enough to establish a stable breeding population so if things go wrong it'll fix itself.

Also there is not enough free oxygen now to support large active animals like that without creating a sealed environment. (Edit: There is some debate over that statement)
Well those sealed enclosures would then open up for a potential Carboniferous Park. I just sincerely hope that they wont recreate the mesothelae since that thing is my worst nightmare come true. A giant spider. Although Meganeura would be kind of awesome.

Or one could make a Silurian Waterworld (I hear that Brontoscorpio was quite an impressive specimen).
Oh god I forgot the implications of high oxygen ecosystems. FORGET GIANT REPTILE(-analogues) GIANT INSECTS!!!!
 

MrFalconfly

New member
Sep 5, 2011
913
0
0
Imthatguy said:
Hornet0404 said:
Imthatguy said:
Ehh most posters are forgetting that most dinosaurs where small also just don't make enough to establish a stable breeding population so if things go wrong it'll fix itself.

Also there is not enough free oxygen now to support large active animals like that without creating a sealed environment. (Edit: There is some debate over that statement)
Well those sealed enclosures would then open up for a potential Carboniferous Park. I just sincerely hope that they wont recreate the mesothelae since that thing is my worst nightmare come true. A giant spider. Although Meganeura would be kind of awesome.

Or one could make a Silurian Waterworld (I hear that Brontoscorpio was quite an impressive specimen).
Oh god I forgot the implications of high oxygen ecosystems. FORGET GIANT REPTILE(-analogues) GIANT INSECTS!!!!
But Meganeura (the giant 1m wingspan dragonfly) is cool.
 

Shoggoth2588

New member
Aug 31, 2009
10,247
0
0
Nouw said:
No, we should make a Cretaceous Park instead.
That would likely be the best bet actually...of course for marketing purposes, Jurassic Park may have to keep its name. Another interesting idea would be a Jurassic Aquarium.


 

Kikyoo

New member
Apr 16, 2008
124
0
0
If we could create dinosaurs from nothing? Yes we should.
Why? well honestly it would be a very short road from making the first one, to solving world hunger. If we can breed and slaughter cows by the hundreds you better believe I think T-rex legs with a side of mashed potatoes would be great. Just one of those things would feed so many people it's not even funny. And they are extinct. They don't have any rights. Nobody can say we're damaging the ecology by raising them and having them for dinner like this. So yeah buddy you better believe I think we should. Let the Dinosaur steaks roll on!
 

ramboondiea

New member
Oct 11, 2010
1,055
0
0
yes if we can bring dinosaurs back then we certainly should. however what we shouldn't do is then turn it into a theme park where people can actually get close to them, and we especially shouldn't send Samuel Jackson off on his own haha
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,485
0
0
No, because...


That in mind, I REALLY don't see any reason for further comment.