Exactly, 400% would mean cancer is basically better than gaming.UmJammerSully said:1 hour takes 4 hours of life away? Then no way. If it was something more reasonable like 1 hour of gaming is 1 hour of life lost then absolutely.
It's meant to show the ridiculousness of trying to keep yourself from doing anything based entirely on the end consequences. I think it comes from the fact that pure oxygen (not air, just the oxygen gas) is dangerous if exposed for long periods.lacktheknack said:That... defies logic. Because taken literally, your lifespan decreases by not breathing regularly (body gets less oxygen) and assuming a breath takes twenty seconds, this would mean that your life would be ONE NINTH of the norm (so you'd be ten at the most). Taken otherwise, it's still a dumb statement (as the normal lifespan is determined by a population, ALL OF WHOM ARE BREATHING).HalfTangible said:They say every time you breathe in you lose 3 minutes of your lifespan.
Basically, citation needed, as I'm clearly missing something. Are they trying to tell me that if I stopped breathing now and suffered no ill effects, I'd live to be 700?
Yeah, I'd rather play games than live real life. Hell, I already play games to escape life, lol.cydvis said:Of course I'll keep playing !
Because the real world sucks, and I need that to not going completely insane (or stupid).
... but I will only play good games.
Don't say that out loud, someone somewhere will commit suicide to live longer.HalfTangible said:It's meant to show the ridiculousness of trying to keep yourself from doing anything based entirely on the end consequences. I think it comes from the fact that pure oxygen (not air, just the oxygen gas) is dangerous if exposed for long periods.lacktheknack said:That... defies logic. Because taken literally, your lifespan decreases by not breathing regularly (body gets less oxygen) and assuming a breath takes twenty seconds, this would mean that your life would be ONE NINTH of the norm (so you'd be ten at the most). Taken otherwise, it's still a dumb statement (as the normal lifespan is determined by a population, ALL OF WHOM ARE BREATHING).HalfTangible said:They say every time you breathe in you lose 3 minutes of your lifespan.
Basically, citation needed, as I'm clearly missing something. Are they trying to tell me that if I stopped breathing now and suffered no ill effects, I'd live to be 700?
Sorta like this quote: 'Life has a 100% mortality rate.'
Or refuse to have a baby so IT will survive.lacktheknack said:Don't say that out loud, someone somewhere will commit suicide to live longer.HalfTangible said:It's meant to show the ridiculousness of trying to keep yourself from doing anything based entirely on the end consequences. I think it comes from the fact that pure oxygen (not air, just the oxygen gas) is dangerous if exposed for long periods.lacktheknack said:That... defies logic. Because taken literally, your lifespan decreases by not breathing regularly (body gets less oxygen) and assuming a breath takes twenty seconds, this would mean that your life would be ONE NINTH of the norm (so you'd be ten at the most). Taken otherwise, it's still a dumb statement (as the normal lifespan is determined by a population, ALL OF WHOM ARE BREATHING).HalfTangible said:They say every time you breathe in you lose 3 minutes of your lifespan.
Basically, citation needed, as I'm clearly missing something. Are they trying to tell me that if I stopped breathing now and suffered no ill effects, I'd live to be 700?
Sorta like this quote: 'Life has a 100% mortality rate.'![]()