Poll: Irony...

Recommended Videos

Nigh Invulnerable

New member
Jan 5, 2009
2,497
0
0
curlycrouton said:
bodyklok said:
This is wrong on several levels...

The most basic being: Christmas can be celebrated secularly, as a commercial holiday.
It's not even Christian.

Jesus was definitely not born during the Winter, since the bible records shepherds tending their sheep in the fields on that night. This is quite unlikely to have happened during a cold Judean winter. Christmas was held on the 25th of December to coincide with the Pagan festival of the Son of Isis (Goddess of Nature). Traditions included raucous partying, gluttonous eating and drinking, and gift-giving.

Yet another self-contradiction, courtesy of Christianity.
I don't know that I'd call it "self-contradiction" so much as adaptation. The Romans had recently become a Christian nation thanks to Constantine's deathbed decision and they simply merged the celebration of Christ's birth with their previous holiday for winter/Yule. That doesn't seem like a contradiction so much as people just trying to adapt a new cultural idea to fit with the existing ones.
 

historybuff

New member
Feb 15, 2009
1,888
0
0
Well, to be fair--Christmas was originally a pagan holiday. It was only given the Christ connotation later.
 

Legion

Were it so easy
Oct 2, 2008
7,186
0
0
Christmas has nothing to do with Jesus anyway seeing as he wasn't born in December, it's a religious festival stolen from the Pagans who are celebrating the end of the life cycle (Winter) and looking forward to the beginning of the next one (Spring).

The festival is called Yule and it actually takes place on the 21st/22nd of December.

Funnily enough, all Christian holidays are stolen from Pagan ones.

I am not saying this to insult those who believe in God, rather pointing out that all organised religions stole things from the most previous most common religion.
 

Puzzles

New member
Aug 9, 2009
793
0
0
Eh, it's been said already but pagans and mithraism got ripped off by christianity.

Since there are almost no mithraic followers now, and very few pagans, it is equally ironic that anyone religious would celebrate it.

But it has become an adopted tradition for christianity, just as business adopted it for commercial gain giving all us atheists just as much cause to celebrate it.

In the end it isn't that ironic at all, because it is just a tradition pretty much removed entirely from its religious origins.
 

Cavouku

New member
Mar 14, 2008
1,122
0
0
Christmas goes back way further than even the Pagans. To the Egyptians, and possibly further. Christ would probably've had to be born in fall. Christmas's religious ties are void now.
 

The Austin

New member
Jul 20, 2009
3,367
0
0
Fat Man Spoon said:
Do you notice that most people who are non-religious still celebrate christmas, not just gamers?

Jirlond said:
I figured due to the nature of the site I would focus on gamers
Hmm.

Sure, we're hypocrites by that analogy.


....How did you get this quote if he posted after you?

*Head explodes in confusion*
 

Sparrow

New member
Feb 22, 2009
6,848
0
0
Jirlond said:
curlycrouton said:
Not to be presumptuous, but is this a subtle dig towards atheists?
I am non religeous myself - I just like how people get focused and greedy about xmas
I like how my boxer shorts feel after I take them off the radiator and pop them on in the morning, but I'm not going to start a discussion about it am I?
 

Chimpzy_v1legacy

Warning! Contains bananas!
Jun 21, 2009
4,786
1
0
Like almost every religious holiday, Christmas is an adapted & christianized form of an older, pagan holiday/celebration.

Anyways, any excuse to pig out and get some days off is good enough for me.
 

Fraught

New member
Aug 2, 2008
4,417
0
0
Jirlond said:
Do you notice how many gamers are non-religious, but a lot of them are looking forward to christmas?
Do you notice how the religious undertone of Christmas has turned into a worldwide celebration, mainly awaited for the shitloads of presents and good food and happy Christmas movies and meeting with your family and spending time with them and so on?
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,392
0
0
NeutralDrow said:
Jirlond said:
bodyklok said:
This is wrong on several levels...

The most basic being: Christmas can be celebrated secularly, as a commercial holiday.
It has christ in the name
It also has "mass" in the name. Does that mean only Catholics and Anglicans are allowed to celebrate it?
It actually has "mas" in it, which is Spanish for "more." Someone decided to play a little game and say we all need more Christ in our lives.

Bastard

OT: Christmas is a secular holiday, so no, it's not hypocritical for the nonreligious to celebrate it.
 

ben---neb

No duckies...only drowning
Apr 22, 2009
932
0
0
I celebrate two Christmas events. The first being the commercial present giving one on December 25th. The second is to celebrate the birth of Jesus and I do this in my church on the Sunday before Christmas.

If Christmas falls on a Sunday we go to church and have the present giving bit on the Monday. Thus do I seperate out what Christmas means to various people and still celebrate both.

Jesus wasn't born in December anyway, you don't hold a census during Winter. It doesn't really matter when you celebrate his birth.
 

GenHellspawn

New member
Jan 1, 2008
1,841
0
0
Christmas is about proving to your family you love them by spending all your money. Any religious or sentimental meaning it once had is surely gone.
 

Jirlond

New member
Jul 9, 2009
809
0
0
GenHellspawn said:
Christmas is about proving to your family you love them by spending all your money. Any religious or sentimental meaning it once had is surely gone.
Do you need a day to prove to your family you love them? Surely it should be a given - I think we do so on this day because we are told to love by corporations etc that say prove to your family you love them by buying them a new 6000 S.U.X - cookie to anyone who knows where tit's from
 

CrashBang

New member
Jun 15, 2009
2,602
0
0
I have to admit I am a hypocrite. I am a strong hater of religion and obviously a massive atheist and humanist. Buuuut ever since I can remember, my favourite time of the year is Xmas.
I suppose my only defence is the commercial side of it. Everyone loves giving and recieving presents, everyone loves making cakes, decorating their house and their tree and everyone love Santa Claus. I just love spending this time with my family, giving each other presents etc. I try not to associate it with it's Christian origins (although I am grateful to Christianity for Xmas). I'm fine with being a hypocrite, cos I'd rather that than have to go without my favourite time of the year, however much that makes it seem like I'm giving up on my beliefs (although I could say that being an atheist I actually have NO beliefs and therefore can do what I want lol.
Wow, I should have shut up 12 paragraphs ago
 

Puzzles

New member
Aug 9, 2009
793
0
0
The Austin said:
....How did you get this quote if he posted after you?

*Head explodes in confusion*
There is a button that they don't tell you about that lets you do things like this. I only know because a friend of a friend told me.

Look slightly to the left of the reply button on your original post, it has to be your own post. It might be hard to see, but try hit the little blue thing there.
 

Gizmo

New member
May 4, 2009
237
0
0
Captain Pancake said:
You have to realise, to most people christmas is no longer about christ the redeemer and all that religious stuff, it's about family bonding and a time of rest. think about it, christmas is during the harshest month of the year. hundreds of years ago, people would be so distressed by the terrible cold and lack of crops that without a festival like christmas, many people would lose hope. it's all to raise moral in the trying winter months.
I must say that was really nicely put and i think you about covered it right there.
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
I celebrate Christmas as a cultural holiday. In my culture we get together with family and exchange gifts, even when we secretly loath each other.

The whole nativity is BS anyway, without even mentioning the virgin pregnancy. No one new where he was born but the old testament led the Jews to expect Bethlehem. So Matthew and Luke opted for Bethlehem. The census doesn't match up with dates, and would still be no reason to go to Bethlehem. Mathew and Luke are the only two who mention the nativity and their accounts clash.

All of it, the virgin birth, worship by kings, the star in the east were all lifted straight from mediterranean and near east religions that were around at the time. So its a cultural holiday going back further than Christianity.

No hipocracy required.