Politeia said:
I'm not sure what you're trying to get at;
That their anti-EA stance does not translate into anything meaningful. That they might be anti-EA is one thing, but you said they were looking for a chance to dick over EA, and they didn't do that. EA sells awesome on Steam, Mass Effect 3 and other Origin-exclusive titles still sell good (Awesome in the case of ME3), and literally nothing's changed except the fanboys are running two invasive DRM clients instead of one.
It is, to borrow from some old dead dude, the tale of an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Consumers are excessively vocal these days, but completely unwilling to inconvenience themselves in any way imaginable. This is why the call of "boycott" is so meaningless these days; instead of boycotting the product, people scream loudly then buy it quietly.
There was a lot of sound and fury once about a little client called Steam. most of the things people say about Origin now were once said about Steam. And people bought the Steam-mandatory games anyway, and Steam became an incredible asset for Valve because nobody wanted to give up their precious games. And Origins, even if it sucks, stands to do the same, because nobody wants to give up their precious games.