Poll: Is EA refusing to have ME3 on steam going to change anything?

Recommended Videos

EquestrianGeneral

New member
Jun 22, 2012
113
0
0
I wouldn't say that it's a "Start," considering that they've been doing this for a while. After Origin launched, I'm fairly sure they removed some of their games from Steam.

Since then, however, they have actually released some through Steam (such as Revelations and Crysis 2), but are still omitting their heavy-hitters like Battlefield 3.

In the end, the only thing that's going to change is that EA is going to lose even more money through lost sales.
 

Typhusoid

New member
Nov 20, 2008
353
0
0
I must say, I really dislike the people who say 'It's not on Steam, so I'm not buying.' It's such a poor reason IMHO. Can't you just uninstall Origin afterwards if it really bothers you that much? Additionally, it feeds into Valve's monopoly on digital distribution. Think people: If you'll always buy Steam and only Steam, what incentive has Valve to continue to improve their service. And what if another, smaller company came up with a really great idea/service? You'd never even know.

The famous TotalBiscuit has a longer, more detailed rant on this topic on his channel, if anyone's interested.
 

EquestrianGeneral

New member
Jun 22, 2012
113
0
0
Typhusoid said:
I must say, I really dislike the people who say 'It's not on Steam, so I'm not buying.' It's such a poor reason IMHO. Can't you just uninstall Origin afterwards if it really bothers you that much? Additionally, it feeds into Valve's monopoly on digital distribution. Think people: If you'll always buy Steam and only Steam, what incentive has Valve to continue to improve their service. And what if another, smaller company came up with a really great idea/service? You'd never even know.
Here's how I look at it. I enjoy services such as Good Old Games, and I don't only shop on Steam. It's just that Steam is the most well-run digital service (with such a wide range of games) that we have as PC players. Not to mention, if there are so few other actual good digital distribution services, then Steam is quite an appealing option. :/
 

Zaik

New member
Jul 20, 2009
2,077
0
0
Hazzard said:
shrekfan246 said:
I'm tempted to ask if the OP has been living under a rock all of this time... :D
I haven't lived under a rock, it just suddenly occurred to me that this might not be a one-off and is a slippery slope. It now appears to me that it isn;t, it's already happened.

And EA can't pull games off steam can though? I thought that broke a consumer agreement or something.
Not exactly.

Anyone who bought it before they pulled it has to be allowed to access it on Steam.

They can opt to not sell it to anyone else on Steam though.
 

Typhusoid

New member
Nov 20, 2008
353
0
0
EquestrianGeneral said:
Typhusoid said:
I must say, I really dislike the people who say 'It's not on Steam, so I'm not buying.' It's such a poor reason IMHO. Can't you just uninstall Origin afterwards if it really bothers you that much? Additionally, it feeds into Valve's monopoly on digital distribution. Think people: If you'll always buy Steam and only Steam, what incentive has Valve to continue to improve their service. And what if another, smaller company came up with a really great idea/service? You'd never even know.
Here's how I look at it. I enjoy services such as Good Old Games, and I don't only shop on Steam. It's just that Steam is the most well-run digital service (with such a wide range of games) that we have as PC players. Not to mention, if there are so few other actual good digital distribution services, then Steam is quite an appealing option. :/
That's great, the perfect attitude to have in my view. I'm not criticising Steam; I use it myself and it's a great service. My beef is with the people who flatly refuse to use GOG, Gamer's Gate, Origin or anything other than Steam.
 

VoidWanderer

New member
Sep 17, 2011
1,551
0
0
Communications Breakdown?

That's like a Holden car dealer selling Ford cars.

Or Portal being sold on Origin!
 

Vausch

New member
Dec 7, 2009
1,476
0
0
I only say "no" because the start was when EA played the "I'm taking my ball and going home" move and created Origin.
 

Enizer

New member
Mar 20, 2009
75
0
0
well, i think communications first started breaking down with the crysis 2 thing, where crysis 2 was pulled from steam something like 2 days after release

so yeah, this is a symptom of breaking communications, however, not the start of said break
 

paislyabmj

New member
Mar 25, 2012
134
0
0
Me3 on pc is going to get less sales but ea will get a larger percentage of the profits.More origin accounts get made and in the future origin exclusive games will suffer less due to the larger amount of origin customers making origin a more viable platform for exclusive games in the future.
 
Apr 5, 2008
3,736
0
0
Simply put, EA want to sell their games on Origin only, so they get an even bigger chunk (read: all) of the profits from it. No middle men, they sell it directly. I'd buy it on steam, as I have the first two, I won't use Origin, so they've lost at least one sale. I understand they're promoting Origin, but I can't stand the stupid business practices involved in doing it. Crysis 2 was removed for the same reason, though has just recently been brought back to Steam (don't buy it by the way, it's crap whichever DDP you buy it from!) so maybe it'll be there one day and that's the day I'll buy it.
 

Khazoth

New member
Sep 4, 2008
1,229
0
0
It will definitely change things. Like me never playing Mass Effect 3 again. I hate Origin. Screw you EA.


To be realistic I voted no, its not going to change anything in the grand scheme of things. Fans that really loved the series will go searching for it. There will be a fringe that will not buy it due to it not being easily available.. But.. No.


EA will be EA. They will refuse to listen to their fans, dig their heels in, and do whatever they want.
 

NLS

Norwegian Llama Stylist
Jan 7, 2010
1,594
0
0
shrekfan246 said:
The "start"? The "start" was back when they pulled Crysis 2 off of Steam because they were trying to push Origin forward. Besides, Mass Effect 3 is almost five months old now, which likely means that EA doesn't care about it anymore.

I'm tempted to ask if the OP has been living under a rock all of this time... :D
Actually, things may be softening up. Considering that they re-released Crysis 2 a few months ago, maybe they'll give ME3 and BF3 the same treatment. Buuut, it will probably be years from now, a sort of "Get it first on Origin, or find it in the cheapo-bin at Steam, except it's still full retail price years afterwards"-deal is what I imagine.
 

Combustion Kevin

New member
Nov 17, 2011
1,206
0
0
a poor marketing choice is all I'm seeing, less people will have bought it because its not on steam, less sales means less of EA's precious profit.

even if Valve takes a cut from the income, it would still even out on both long and short term sales, not having it on Steam just seems petty on EA's part.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
Politeia said:
I said it was more likely, not that they wouldn't mind. You can't deny that most folks who would consider themselves Valve fans would likely have a very negative view of EA.
So, there's more likely, but only in an intangible and meaningless sense.