The difference between playing a video game
zehydra said:
Nope. As I'm sure others have already said, we kill thousands of people in CoD, but that doesn't make us killers, and it does't mean we condone murder, or war for that matter.
I think there's a big, big difference between saying that playing rape-centric video games reads to rape and saying that it is wrong
in and of itself to enjoy simulated rape. I don't think that we will have more rapists if games like Rapelay become more popular; I am, however, absolutely sure that it is not conducive to the formation of compassionate and reasoned views regarding sexual violence. The very idea of playing a video game where enjoyment is derived from inflicting trauma and pain upon a child is repulsive to me, not because of some imagined result, but because of the disgusting nature of the act itself.
ProjectTrinity said:
No, and unless you're against seeing murder or even torture/violence in a game, you shouldn't think otherwise, either. Any other answer is borderline putting your emotions too into the cold logic of "torture and death is a *lot* more permanent than rape". You can argue emotional impact, but I would *love* to hear how torture is less emotionally horrifying than rape.
A video game that just plopped a body in front of you and allowed you to act out violent fantasies on it would be equally objectionable. There's a difference between violence being used as a game mechanic in order to facilitate the exercising of skill/reflexes/strategy - that's COD, Painkiller, and the like - and a program that exists just to satisfy the most prurient and base violent impulses of the player without actually being a game at all.