Ah, now I get your point. The mentality over here in the Netherlands is not that you study history (or sociology, or anthropology) because you want to work in a related field, but because you're interested in the field and the skills/qualities you're taught.Yopaz said:As far as I know these fields are hardly the kind you want to study if you plan to work with something relevant to it. I don't know about the states, but here there's always the choice to take an extra year and teach in these subjects, but the most recent statistics here show that those who study sociology rarely get a job relevant to their education and usually the ones that earn the least. Most of my education will be irrelevant for me if I end up being a teacher, but I will always be happy that I had the opportunity to learn about a lot of interesting things. I've learned how to genetically enhance microorganisms and how to make industrial explosives, neither is relevant, but both appeal to my interests. So you make an excellent point when you say it's important to consider the knowledge and skills, but the job is required to get value out of the money spent on the education.Spinozaad said:Is it really that bad in the States? Over here you'll get a job with those studies. Perhaps you won't get a job "in" history, but the skills you learn will get you a job, if only in the civil service.Yopaz said:Literature, history, sociology and art are perfect examples of what wont get you a job.
People shouldn't see university as a place where you "learn" how to do "a job". But you will learn valuable skills and knowledge.
I can't speak for fields other than history, but the writing and research skills, along with analytical/critical thinking, a broad knowledge of society and other fields will set you up for a nice career in, for example, the civil service.