no, but it'll be doing better once it gets over this 'FPS' phase it's been in for what feels like forever
But those games came before the rise of paradoxically hyper realistic cartoon shooters like CoD and while Sotc and Okami is a lot better games in that period had tons of variety in itself. We don't have that anymore. Save for maybe rpg's which not everyone is interested in the aaa market has become entirely shooter with multiplayer, we are pumping out like 2 genres out of the tons of already established and we aren't experimenting with others.Daystar Clarion said:Planescape Torment, Shadow of the Colossus, Okami.Zhukov said:Thing is, movies also have their Black Swan and Children of Men. Books have their Tolstoy and Pratchett.Daystar Clarion said:Every media has an area devoted to mass market appeal.
Just at look at movies, TV, books, music, all these outlets have something that appeals to the mass market, despite being frowned upon by people who are more experienced with the intricacies of the media.
TV as reality TV, movies have the likes of the Transformers movies, books have Dan Brown (ugh, that guy sucks so much).
It's an inevitable consequence of popularity.
Games have... what exactly?
Sure these titles aren't comparable to the greatest books and movies, but gaming is a lot younger than those things.
We'll have our time, don't worry about that.
Remember when every FPS was set in World War 2?him over there said:But those games came before the rise of paradoxically hyper realistic cartoon shooters like CoD and while Sotc and Okami is a lot better games in that period had tons of variety in itself. We don't have that anymore. Save for maybe rpg's which not everyone is interested in the aaa market has become entirely shooter with multiplayer, we are pumping out like 2 genres out of the tons of already established and we aren't experimenting with others.Daystar Clarion said:Planescape Torment, Shadow of the Colossus, Okami.Zhukov said:Thing is, movies also have their Black Swan and Children of Men. Books have their Tolstoy and Pratchett.Daystar Clarion said:Every media has an area devoted to mass market appeal.
Just at look at movies, TV, books, music, all these outlets have something that appeals to the mass market, despite being frowned upon by people who are more experienced with the intricacies of the media.
TV as reality TV, movies have the likes of the Transformers movies, books have Dan Brown (ugh, that guy sucks so much).
It's an inevitable consequence of popularity.
Games have... what exactly?
Sure these titles aren't comparable to the greatest books and movies, but gaming is a lot younger than those things.
We'll have our time, don't worry about that.
Zachary Amaranth said:I am going to disagree with you here, here is why.The Madman said:CBut Mario didn't set sales expectations or even sequel expectations. Neither did fighters in the 90s, or JRPGs in the late 90s/early 2000s. .
Mario indeed wasnt the multimillion dollar smash hit that claim the top spots today, however it was popular and influential enough that the 2D platformer became the standard go to solution for every shitty game that was either a movie/comic/cartoon/toy tie in. From Barbie to Seven Ups Cool Spot, they all massively abused the idea and churned out crap around the clock.
The fighters of the 90s in their own right did the same thing, with hundreds of shitty clones that featured at least a Ryu type Character.
Finally the JRPGs, just because most of them didnt make it oversees, doesnt mean Japan wasnt drowning in them, If you mention one Anime series from the 80s-00s era it had a JRPG game.
Thank you for trying to lift my spirits, and I really hope that you're right. Also I've been thinking of getting into pc gaming (even though I know nothing about pc's)because of the aaa scene and how big budgets require big revenues means little experimenting or progress. The non united platform of pc's means that games that aren't top tier in graphics or length can still find a home from all parts of the spectrum. On consoles you have $60 aaa and $10 mini download games. Why aren't there games that meet like gamecube or ps2 standards for like $25-30 dollars. Consoles are pushing out a lot of options.Daystar Clarion said:Remember when every FPS was set in World War 2?
Now we barely see any WW2 shooters.
Trust me, modern military shooters will pass, just like they did.
If you have the money, then do it. You just have so many more options on a PC, you'll never run out of games to enjoy, especially if you're willing to try older games. You don't even need to get a really expensive PC, just a reasonably fast desktop computer. A lot of the games that require an expensive PC to run also come out on consoles, but a lot of high-quality games that don't require a fancy PC aren't available on any other platform. There's also mods, which let you enjoy your games in ways that would never be possible on a console. Plus, if you do decide later on that you want to run those graphically-demanding games on your PC, it's not a huge deal to upgrade it as long as you have a good processor.him over there said:Thank you for trying to lift my spirits, and I really hope that you're right. Also I've been thinking of getting into pc gaming (even though I know nothing about pc's)because of the aaa scene and how big budgets require big revenues means little experimenting or progress. The non united platform of pc's means that games that aren't top tier in graphics or length can still find a home from all parts of the spectrum. On consoles you have $60 aaa and $10 mini download games. Why aren't there games that meet like gamecube or ps2 standards for like $25-30 dollars. Consoles are pushing out a lot of options.
Thanks for the encouragement but my main problem is I have no real knowledge of the workings or requirements of pcs. I doubt I'd be able to work my way around a lot of things. I would love to get in on it however. What you're saying about marketing and searching makes sense but isn't it kind of a bad sign that it's the mediocre games that get all the attention; and not for being mediocre.ComradeJim270 said:If you have the money, then do it. You just have so many more options on a PC, you'll never run out of games to enjoy, especially if you're willing to try older games. You don't even need to get a really expensive PC, just a reasonably fast desktop computer. A lot of the games that require an expensive PC to run also come out on consoles, but a lot of high-quality games that don't require a fancy PC aren't available on any other platform. There's also mods, which let you enjoy your games in ways that would never be possible on a console. Plus, if you do decide later on that you want to run those graphically-demanding games on your PC, it's not a huge deal to upgrade it as long as you have a good processor.
That's... that's it?ToastiestZombie said:Games have Bastion, LA Noire, Portal. Those three are some of the best storytelling experiences I have had. You cannot of told those storys without it being interactive.Zhukov said:Thing is, movies also have their Black Swan and Children of Men. Books have their Tolstoy and Pratchett.Daystar Clarion said:Every media has an area devoted to mass market appeal.
Just at look at movies, TV, books, music, all these outlets have something that appeals to the mass market, despite being frowned upon by people who are more experienced with the intricacies of the media.
TV as reality TV, movies have the likes of the Transformers movies, books have Dan Brown (ugh, that guy sucks so much).
It's an inevitable consequence of popularity.
Games have... what exactly?
Once again, those are good games. (Can't speak for Okami, haven't played it.) But the notion that they are the best we can come up with is just a tad depressing.Daystar Clarion said:Planescape Torment, Shadow of the Colossus, Okami.Zhukov said:Thing is, movies also have their Black Swan and Children of Men. Books have their Tolstoy and Pratchett.
Games have... what exactly?
Well, that's some consolation.Sure these titles aren't comparable to the greatest books and movies, but gaming is a lot younger than those things.
We'll have our time, don't worry about that.
Uh huh.lRookiel said:Yep, baby steps at the moment. Hopefully EA and Activision will make something DIFFERENT (And not just Activision using some Treyarch piece of shit as an excuse either) this year...Zhukov said:[self-snip]
I however think this year will be a shit one for the industry (ME3). What we need right now is a Baldurs gate 3! :3