Poll: Is this fair? a question of creepy porn

[iron codpiece]

I think that having this outlet allows him to exploit his fantasies without going to the lengths of harming other people, I for one enjoy a lot of different stiles of Hentai, that is my personal preference, one particular theme I enjoy is incest (brother sister to be more precise), incest is still a felony, if you think i´m a pervert well I might be

Wheather or not I think you're a pervert depends...
just how hot is your sister?

 

[HentMas]

I think that having this outlet allows him to exploit his fantasies without going to the lengths of harming other people, I for one enjoy a lot of different stiles of Hentai, that is my personal preference, one particular theme I enjoy is incest (brother sister to be more precise), incest is still a felony, if you think i´m a pervert well I might be

Wheather or not I think you're a pervert depends...
just how hot is your sister?

well thats the thing, i have no sister, but still the "story" and the "mental link" one makes is an outlet for those who doesnt have sisters.

 

[HentMas]

i´m sorry but i don't think a person that haves a taste for "drawings" can ever get "bored" of them, i actually love Hentai, and i never get bored, why?? because in my mind they are much better than real women, really i think that if a person gets aroused with something "specific" even if that is not real, it doesn´t make it posible for the same person to see the same appeal in the concept of "reality"

plain English, nothing can beat my own imagination, not even a real woman.

im sorry, did i say that it applied to "everyone" ? no? thought not. also i don't remember asking if you did or didn't like hentai, and also another point is there is a difference between "normal" hentai and that creepy loli shit he had.
also, if no woman is as good as your imagination, well....

Whoa there a second. You admit it doesn't apply to everyone yet still think we should charge this guy like it's already applied to him? I quote "he will get bored" - so it doesn't apply to everyone but it applies to him? Or are people with paedophilic urges all built to your personal stereotypes? Sheesh, what happened to innocent until proven guilty?

hes proven guilty of having child porn, in one form or another. people with paedophilic urges are not all built to my stereotype. some start out as paedophiles, some become paedophiles due to child abuse. the point is a paedophile is a paedophile, and should be dealt with as such. if i wanted to get really controversial i would point out that i believe anyone who is a paedophile and has actual child porn should be chemically castrated, to remove there sexual urges. if this were to become reality, i would let this man just serve prison time, as he only had drawings, and might be reformable.

ohhh, ok i see your point there, let me see if i got you right

you are agreeing that he must serve time in jail because the real pedophiles should have much harsher punishment, well... by following your train of thought i see why you would think its ok to send a person with pedophilical "urges" to jail

but still, i think we are talking here about "drawings"... it does seem a little off to put a man in jail 15 years for some "drawings"

but i do understand your point

 

[DarthBunny]

So what they were only pictures? They were still pictures created for a section of the populace to enjoy - a section of the populace that, by all accounts, are pedophiles. The images were still evoking the same violent and lustful emotions that a photograph would produce or the act itself would produce. In my opinion the man deserves everything the courts can throw at him.

Wait a second... How would you know what raping a child would feel like?

It's not about the emotions the picture evokes. If a videogame evokes the same emotions that killing a person does, does that mean I killed a man? No. It's about the victim.

It's a victimless crime.

I don't believe I did say what raping a child would feel like, but if that's the way it came across I assure you that wasn't my intention.

That was the idea about mentioning the laws (or rather the lack of) surrounding Child Pornography.

However going by the laws of the state still a crime. I was trying put across the view that although merely viewing these images could be of no or harm to any child or in fact help prevent pedophilia the point still stands that he broke the law. Now if that means a revision of said law should be implemented then so be it. As mentioned the law could be flawed in certain respects and so should be questioned.