RealLifev2.0.09 said:
I just find these comments kind of funny but wanted to answer some points...
* If they are angels does it really matter what weapon they are using?
* To be honest I do not see the possession anywhere in the preview so I am assuming your confusing them for taking on the form of a human. ( Look at Lot and the two visitors that look like beautiful men but are actually angels in Genesis)
* How do you know what an angel looks like? Because Michelangelo painted beings with wings on the Sistine chapel?
* I agree with you on this point it looks like a B-Movie.
* So Noah and his family were anti-Christs since they survived the flood? I am confused with this logic.
* After the flood it is said that the world would never be flooded again, as is the promise of the covenant of the rainbow. However what was not declared was that God would never try to destroy humanity again, as is obvious with all the predictions of an apocalypse with revelations if you believe in the whole apocalypse sort of thing.
One thing I think people fail to realize is that when it comes to a God like being. Why would this God operate on the same level of morality? Would it be genocide for God to flood the earth? Or in being God can you be anything but right?
Allow me to reply to that.
* No, but considering they have weapons far more efficient than human guns, it's kind of strange.
* Good point. But if the idea is to wipe out humanity, God seems to be forgetting one thing: HE IS GOD. Stealth is not required here, because judging by the preview and the previous (Biblical) abilities demonstrated by angels, somewhere around twenty would be more than enough to kill everything everywhere.
* I doubt they're the winged perfections that Michelangelo painted (especially those damn baby angel things; I hate those) but if this movie is based on the Bible in any way, it gives enough description of angels to definitely deny them the interpretation of angels looking like something out of Silent Hill.
* Glad to see we agree.
* Now that's not quite what I meant. Hear me out. The way the preview describes it, the woman's baby is more like John Conner from Terminator than Noah and family. It sounds more like he's not supposed to survive God's wrath, more like defeat God... somehow. Now, listen to this: The child grows up, gathers all of humanity under his influence, and directly defies God. Does that sound more like Noah, or the fucking Antichrist to you?
* Now, there's another point where I don't think I was clear. First off, God himself basically says in the Bible he does not go back on his word. In the movie, what is he doing? Going back on his word in every sense. Maybe I'm wrong here (haven't seen the movie, obviously) but it sounds like as opposed to what is described in Revelation, it's more like an extermination: God saying "fuck it", forgoing salvation for the faithful entirely, and just wiping out humanity as a whole. If this is indeed the Abrahamic God, then that right there is the biggest plot in the history of plot holes.
Maybe God is technically "right", but he is in this case doing the one thing he promised that he would never do, EVER: Lie. I mean, seriously. He said he would judge us, but never more than we could handle: An army of nigh-omnipotent servants sound like a lot more than the average human can handle, ESPECIALLY if they're some terrifying crossbreed between Biblical angels and every monster from every horror movie ever made.