I don't agree with the contract idea (especially forcing an abortion is never the way to go), but I do have another. Simply when the child is born, give the father a choice. If he wishes to stay with the child and be able to be with them, he must pay the child support should the parents separate as long as he wishes to see the child. If he does not wish to see the child, he does not have to pay anything but cannot communicate with the child without the mother's consent and presence.
However, if the male was not legally informed of the birth of the child within six months after the child was born, he can not be held legally responsible for child support and he must decide to pay should he wish to visit the child or with the mother's consent. This issue is a gray area, as people say the guy has no rights since "he should have kept it in his pants," yet the girl is rarely blamed because she also gave into temptation is just as equally careless. Both parties have ups and downs for their decision, but no side should be blamed more harshly than the other.
This is all if both sides were consenting to the sexual intercourse. Condoms break, pills are forgotten, one side sabotages the control, etc. As long as it was consenting sexual intercourse, regardless if foul play in the controlling products to prevent pregnancies, then these conditions must be met. This way if a male doesn't want to pay the support for a child he never wanted, he doesn't have to, but he loses his right to basically visit his child.
However, if the male was not legally informed of the birth of the child within six months after the child was born, he can not be held legally responsible for child support and he must decide to pay should he wish to visit the child or with the mother's consent. This issue is a gray area, as people say the guy has no rights since "he should have kept it in his pants," yet the girl is rarely blamed because she also gave into temptation is just as equally careless. Both parties have ups and downs for their decision, but no side should be blamed more harshly than the other.
This is all if both sides were consenting to the sexual intercourse. Condoms break, pills are forgotten, one side sabotages the control, etc. As long as it was consenting sexual intercourse, regardless if foul play in the controlling products to prevent pregnancies, then these conditions must be met. This way if a male doesn't want to pay the support for a child he never wanted, he doesn't have to, but he loses his right to basically visit his child.