No offence to Penn and teller (i don't know who they are sorry) but that sounds like an extremely ignorant thing to say. For a start it's a blanket statement that relates to maybe 2% of all martial arts and is totally untrue for the remaining 98%. The applications of martial arts in terms of conflict management alone are vast and abundantly obvious to anyone who has examined them even a little bit, and that's even if you ignore all of the other amazing things that can be gained from practicing them.Eico said:Me too. P&T are amazingly intelligent and hilarious.Shade184 said:P&T are awesome. They can prove just about anything, those guys.Eico said:I do not.
I saw a Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode on martial arts a while back. Pretty much proved what a bad thing they are. Interesting stuff.
However, when I was still doing Zen Do Kai, I had never had more fun in my life, plus the confidence boost and the fitness aspects were both incredible. I can't wait to get back into it.
Basically, they proved martial arts to be a terribly ineffective self-defense tool. Not that there is anything wrong with fun. If it makes you happy and isn't hurting anyone, go ahead, right?
Eico said:While facing a mugger with a gun, Penn and Teller say:Anah said:So, because a pair of popular smart-asses have an opinion, you believe practising Martial Arts is inherently dangerous (and that they are inefficient)? Very, errrr... intelligent.Eico said:I saw a Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode on martial arts a while back. Pretty much proved what a bad thing they are. Interesting stuff.
No one can argue that the best defence is to avoid a confrontation to begin with, but to brush the ability to fend for yourself in case of an emergency under the carpet is ridiculous and as close minded as it can possibly get.
I am also fairly certain that more people hurt themselves practising [insert favourite sport with an inclination towards bodily harm] than getting robbed.
"If we had invested in martial arts training, we could try to go all Bruce Lee on their asses. But a few years ago, we did the arithmetic, and we figured that Karate lessons?even kids? Karate lessons?would cost us a grand or more a year, for each of us. And the hours we spent in class, and driving to the dojo, and practicing and sweating and bowing and Fuck that! We have a better, cheaper, and less risky self-defense system. [Penn hands over his wallet and watch.]"
I agree with the above.
Nam Wah Pai.Okysho said:What kind of Kung-Fu are you taking? I was taught how to handle a knife and even guns at "hold up" positions and "assassin" position.Grimbold said:I am doing Kung-Fu since two years. It won't help much against Knife-wielding Turks or well-trained boxers but it's keeping me fit. Somewhat.
Judo's not just throwing. Judo actually incorporates a large amount of groundwork. In my experience it is about 50/50 however some people use about 90% ground work and 10% take down style throws (Leg sweeps etc rather than shoulder throws).Gordon_4 said:I study a system known as Jishukan Jujitsu. It combines elements of modified Jujitsu (joint locks, pressure points and soft targets), Judo (throwing), Karate (kicks and certain methods of punching or other hand strikes), boxing and recently one sensei has been suplimenting our grappling with BJJ. In short, they aim to train us in such a way that we are well rounded, capable martial artists who will unleash our inner mongrel when required.
Considering the average 2 year old can barely stand let alone perform Kung-Fu... (Unless you ment "I've been doing Kung-Fu for 2 years")Grimbold said:I am doing Kung-Fu since two years. It won't help much against Knife-wielding Turks or well-trained boxers but it's keeping me fit. Somewhat.
Brazilian Jiu Jitsu comes from Judo Carlos Gracie watched a demonstration by Mitsuyo Maeda and became a student of his and from there he developed BJJStBishop said:Judo's not just throwing. Judo actually incorporates a large amount of groundwork. In my experience it is about 50/50 however some people use about 90% ground work and 10% take down style throws (Leg sweeps etc rather than shoulder throws).Gordon_4 said:I study a system known as Jishukan Jujitsu. It combines elements of modified Jujitsu (joint locks, pressure points and soft targets), Judo (throwing), Karate (kicks and certain methods of punching or other hand strikes), boxing and recently one sensei has been suplimenting our grappling with BJJ. In short, they aim to train us in such a way that we are well rounded, capable martial artists who will unleash our inner mongrel when required.
Judo also incorporates chokes, strangles (there's a difference), arm bars and wrist locks in ground work.
More similar to Jujitsu than many believe. I have seen people who've only ever practiced Jujitsu compete in Judo tournaments and visa versa.
But it still doesn't mean you CAN NOT practice them if you don't like. That episode focused primarily on self defense via martial arts, not that the whole idea of it is bad thing.Eico said:I do not.
I saw a Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode on martial arts a while back. Pretty much proved what a bad thing they are. Interesting stuff.
That's laughable. Did they 'prove' how much of a bad thing game stores are by profiling Gamestop?Eico said:I do not.
I saw a Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode on martial arts a while back. Pretty much proved what a bad thing they are. Interesting stuff.
Well that makes sense.MatParker116 said:Brazilian Jiu Jitsu comes from Judo Carlos Gracie watched a demonstration by Mitsuyo Maeda and became a student of his and from there he developed BJJStBishop said:Judo's not just throwing. Judo actually incorporates a large amount of groundwork. In my experience it is about 50/50 however some people use about 90% ground work and 10% take down style throws (Leg sweeps etc rather than shoulder throws).Gordon_4 said:I study a system known as Jishukan Jujitsu. It combines elements of modified Jujitsu (joint locks, pressure points and soft targets), Judo (throwing), Karate (kicks and certain methods of punching or other hand strikes), boxing and recently one sensei has been suplimenting our grappling with BJJ. In short, they aim to train us in such a way that we are well rounded, capable martial artists who will unleash our inner mongrel when required.
Judo also incorporates chokes, strangles (there's a difference), arm bars and wrist locks in ground work.
More similar to Jujitsu than many believe. I have seen people who've only ever practiced Jujitsu compete in Judo tournaments and visa versa.
What a meaningless response. You obviously have no interest in learning or exploring the topic, but you sure love to throw out empty absolutes. How about addressing what I wrote and showing me where it's such a clear 'matter of opinion'. Or are you just going to regurgitate what some magicians on TV said?Eico said:That's your opinion. You're welcome to it.UberNoodle said:That's laughable. Did they 'prove' how much of a bad thing game stores are by profiling Gamestop? There's nothing at all wrong with martial arts. I live in Japan where a large amount of them come from. I used to train at the Kyoto Budo Centre. Martial arts are great for fitness, self-awareness and esteem, challenge, patience, co-ordination, spiritual development (in the non religious sense), and so on. THEY ARE NOT, a way to 'learn how to fight'. That is not the tenant or maxim of perhaps ANY proper martial arts schools. The arts taught are a means to further self exploration and development. There's nothing wrong with that at all. That martial arts are primarily personal, allows people to learn self sufficiency if team sports are not their thing. Martial arts also a great way to make friends and connections. If anything is 'wrong' or 'bad', it is because of the teacher or the school.Eico said:I do not.
I saw a Penn and Teller: Bullshit! episode on martial arts a while back. Pretty much proved what a bad thing they are. Interesting stuff.