Poll: Mass Effect 3 DLC - UPDATE!

Recommended Videos

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,536
5
43
Zachary Amaranth said:
nikki191 said:
the last bioware game i buy i swear. this money grabbing shit or store exclusive dlc and now this is really starting to piss me off
Thankfully, you're rewarding them in the short term, which is exactly what they're looking for.

I know right. No point in tolerating their stupidity. Also you're giving EA money to continue being their usual selves.
 

Comic Sans

DOWN YOU GO!
Oct 15, 2008
598
2
23
Country
United States
I really don't get it. Buy figurines, get extra stuff. It's your standard buy one get one free deal you see in stores every day. Buy a figurine, and you get some in-game content as a bonus. You're not paying for the DLC, you're paying for the figurine. What's so bad? Oh, wait, I forgot. It's ELECTRONIC ARTS, so it's automatically EVIL.
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,536
5
43
Comic Sans said:
I really don't get it. Buy figurines, get extra stuff. It's your standard buy one get one free deal you see in stores every day. Buy a figurine, and you get some in-game content as a bonus. You're not paying for the DLC, you're paying for the figurine. What's so bad? Oh, wait, I forgot. It's ELECTRONIC ARTS, so it's automatically EVIL.
Pretty sure that if I wanted dolls, I'd buy thm instead of the game. You know, how the game is what I'm there for and all.
 

Comic Sans

DOWN YOU GO!
Oct 15, 2008
598
2
23
Country
United States
ResonanceSD said:
Comic Sans said:
I really don't get it. Buy figurines, get extra stuff. It's your standard buy one get one free deal you see in stores every day. Buy a figurine, and you get some in-game content as a bonus. You're not paying for the DLC, you're paying for the figurine. What's so bad? Oh, wait, I forgot. It's ELECTRONIC ARTS, so it's automatically EVIL.
Pretty sure that if I wanted dolls, I'd buy thm instead of the game. You know, how the game is what I'm there for and all.
Then don't buy them. Pretty simple. The DLC is there as a bonus for fans of the game who might buy them as an incentive. It's called marketing. Unless the content offered is crazy important to the game and is never made available for purchase outside the figurines, you have nothing to complain about. Some people will like the figurines and will buy them, you are clearly not in that demographic and can calmly go about your life.
 

LordFisheh

New member
Dec 31, 2008
478
0
0
I'm guessing that most of what you're paying for is the figures, and that the dlc will be available separately.

Also, I think their marketing is probably biting them in the ass here. In their rush to sell the figures and the dlc they're promising 'extra content', 'characters', 'the full experience'! In building it up so much they've pissed everyone off by making them feel they're missing out, when really I'm betting the dlc only really amounts to a extra bit of armour or a shiny pistol.
 

Adam Jensen_v1legacy

I never asked for this
Sep 8, 2011
6,647
0
0
This has got to be the dumbest idea I've heard in a long, long time. I just know that EA is behind this. Only they can think that gamers will like something like this. As if Origin wasn't enough. Now they're making us look stupid for buying their game for full price. I just know the DLC is what should have been in the game from the start. All DLC that's announced before the game is released is cut out from the game. Another reason why Mass Effect 3 will be the most pirated game of 2012 for PC. Fuckin' idiots.
 

Durgiun

New member
Dec 25, 2008
842
0
0
Oh BioWare and EA. These shenanigans only serve to make me hate motherfuckers more and more.

And then the fuckers complain about piracy. No shit, when you're trying to frickin' fuck people over.
 

everythingbeeps

New member
Sep 30, 2011
946
0
0
Sounds like the DLC is going to be for multiplayer, in which case I couldn't care less, as I won't be touching the multiplayer.

And I also don't see this as being "in order to get the DLC you have to buy the figure". It's "buy a cool figure, and we'll throw in some DLC with it."

It's gonna be minor DLC, and not something we're gonna care about not having.
 

Xpheyel

New member
Sep 10, 2007
134
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
If I may start on the line.

The Arkham City "Skins" are nonessential.

Horse Armor is nonessential

By definition, anything "cosmetic" is nonessential.

I'd love a return to the days of reasonably priced, full games. Try telling EA/Bioware that.


Cosmetics aren't essential to combat or stat systems but a game that gives you more options in the box price is qualiatively superior to one that limits them to sell after the fact. Garrus running around in broken armor for all of Mass Effect 2 so they could sell you his fixed look was kind of dumb.

Also Horse Armor was patched so it buffs horse hp because of the outcry, I believe.
 

Steampunk Viking

New member
Jan 15, 2010
353
0
0
"sounds neat but all this whining its making me not want to be part of this community"

I can't quote it directly because PC's being rubbish, but I totally agree with this post. If you don't like the idea, don't buy it. Simple. I don't think I've ever seen a topic on this site where people don't immediately start ripping into the subject at hand.

But hey, a high post count must make you cool right?

Personally, I'll buy the figures if I'm interested in them. I'm pretty sure they'll make them individual downloads eventually if I'm really that bothered about them. Plus most (most being the keyword here) DLC is thought up and made after game release, making it a good idea. What I dislike is the fact that we were originally told ME2 DLC would be totally free, then they started charging for it.

Still, they've only been doing this since EA bought them out. Just saying.
 

soren7550

Overly Proud New Yorker
Dec 18, 2008
5,477
0
0
So, to have a small chance at getting a new character, I have to shell out $20? No thank you.
 

Steampunk Viking

New member
Jan 15, 2010
353
0
0
To be fair, it sounds like Bioware put this forward as a fun idea to have with their figures as a little treat for the players, and marketing have tried to push it way too far.
 

putowtin

I'd like to purchase an alcohol!
Jul 7, 2010
3,449
0
0
ResonanceSD said:
[sub]Small point, your statement should in fact read "if I've said it a million times, I've said it once" Otherwise it's just a nonsensical sentence.[/sub]

not in Yorkshire, but if your not a local... your not a local!

OT, just preordered the Garrus statue, he's gonna stand on my bookcase next to Cole MacGrath and Ezio
 

ResonanceSD

Elite Member
Legacy
Dec 14, 2009
4,536
5
43
Steampunk Viking said:
But hey, a high post count must make you cool right?

Personally, I'll buy the figures if I'm interested in them.
Actually it's your badges. Just like in Pokemon.

And yes, your second point is the entire reason this thread exists. To discern exactly who is interested in this idea. So far it's one person.
 

SovietSecrets

iDrink, iSmoke, iPill
Nov 16, 2008
3,972
0
0
So people who like figurines can get DLC that has nothing to do with the story? Whats the problem here?
 

Sabertooth

New member
Jan 23, 2012
24
0
0
EcksTeaSea said:
So people who like figurines can get DLC that has nothing to do with the story? Whats the problem here?
It´s evil apparently.

Preordered Sheppard anyways. Might get Legion and Tali later on. I liked them.
 

AD-Stu

New member
Oct 13, 2011
1,287
0
0
EcksTeaSea said:
So people who like figurines can get DLC that has nothing to do with the story? Whats the problem here?
In a nutshell, I think it's that a LOT more people care about the DLC than the ugly figurines, and many of them don't like the idea that holding that DLC back for buyers of said ugly figurines results in others being supplied with an "incomplete" game (which, incidentally, they've already paid full price for).

I know Mass Effect is promoted as a story-driven game, and that's certainly one of the biggest reasons I play the game, but it's not just a story game. Huge chunks of the game are spent in combat, so holding back weapons and armour (especially if they're non-cosmetic) can affect the game without affecting the plot.
 

Sabertooth

New member
Jan 23, 2012
24
0
0
AD-Stu said:
EcksTeaSea said:
So people who like figurines can get DLC that has nothing to do with the story? Whats the problem here?
In a nutshell, I think it's that a LOT more people care about the DLC than the ugly figurines, and many of them don't like the idea that holding that DLC back for buyers of said ugly figurines results in others being supplied with an "incomplete" game (which, incidentally, they've already paid full price for).

I know Mass Effect is promoted as a story-driven game, and that's certainly one of the biggest reasons I play the game, but it's not just a story game. Huge chunks of the game are spent in combat, so holding back weapons and armour (especially if they're non-cosmetic) can affect the game without affecting the plot.
Is the DLC something crucial for the story? Stuff like "Stolen Memories" was in a sense, non essential.
 

AD-Stu

New member
Oct 13, 2011
1,287
0
0
Sabertooth said:
Is the DLC something crucial for the story? Stuff like "Stolen Memories" was in a sense, non essential.
I've made the point elsewhere that you could also argue Lair of the Shadow Broker and Arrival were non-essential, but that's beside the point.

We don't actually know what the DLC linked to these figurines will be. It's almost certainly safe to assume that it won't affect the main story, but that's beside the point too.

The point is that while the game is story driven, it's not all story. Combat is a huge part of the game as well, so if it's weapons and armour that are being held back combat will be affected and I think it's perfectly valid for people to feel they're being held to ransom for the full experience, even if it doesn't affect the plot.