I agree, but not in the case of MW2.
The rule of that game should've been never bring a gun to a knife fight.
The rule of that game should've been never bring a gun to a knife fight.
They're laughing.TeeBs said:![]()
Its called strategy my friend.
In addition: if you have no combat training or experience with your weapon of choice, neither the knife nor the gun will do you any good. Run.Brawndo said:Real life is not the movies. You will NOT be able to hurl a knife with lethal accuracy at 20 feet while someone is shooting at you. You will NOT be able to do cartwheels through a hail of automatic gunfire a la Resident Evil or Aeon Flux and then stab the gunman in the face.
Firearms are hands-down the most influential man-portable weapons ever created. Even early, unreliable firearms made melee weapons nearly obsolete after only a century or two. For example, the arquebus did to feudal Japan what the nuclear bomb did to modern warfare - it changed everything.
Also, closing the distance with a person wielding a gun does not give a knife the advantage, I don't know what some of you guys are smoking. A handgun is highly maneuverable, not to mention the guy can "stab" the knife-user with his barrel before shooting them. This is not MW2 where knives are insta-kill buttons at any range under 5 feet
Yes, was about to say this, a knife is better than no knife, always.archvile93 said:It's perfectly reasonable to bring a knife to a gunfight, just make sure to bring a gun too.
And haha xD.Zekksta said:Why not both?
![]()
Conceptually interesting and extremely stylish... but completely unreal. The body armor is possible, though he would be incredibly lucky to survive such a fullisade even so (the mask isn't bulletproof, and all armor has weak points). Beyond that, no one is that fast.Zorg Machine said:Has anyone seen the last fight scene from v for vendetta?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLqEWDo1VQk&feature=related (can't embed)
skip to 0:50