HG131 said:
Personally, it's because they're human beings too, and it's kinda suspicious. There was a user banned for it, but he was unbanned because they was no rule against it. So then they make a rule against it.
Well, based on my experience as a moderator of other forums (not here) and chat channels, I've had first hand experience with this sort of issue. And it's basically proof of two things.
First, that The Escapist forums are an evolving organism. Things change... I'm pretty sure that when they first came up with the rules, they never even thought that anyone would discuss a subject in (admittedly my opinion) such poor taste. When it happened, one of the mods reacted and banned the guy. I've been part of similar discussions of the type that I'm sure happened after this... at some point, someone said something like, "Jeesh, I'd never thought we'd need a specific rule to not discuss X."
But it also shows that the staff here are willing to give second chances and react to the community. Now in this case, that reaction was basically along the lines of, "Okay... there wasn't a specific rule against it before, so you've got a second chance; but there is one NOW, so don't do it again". Some people seem to take that sort of reaction as a bad thing, but it's not. It's simply the reality of The Escapist attracting a wider audience, and with more people, the task of moderating becomes much, much harder.