Downfall89 said:
Gashad said:
I thought the Rome total war series was the best and would really like a sequal. Sure balance wasn't the best, and the AI was stupid(then again thats true in most TW games), but I found the battles really enjoyable, and enjoyed the varied factions.
Same. Playing as any of the three factions of Rome is godlike.
Try the SPQR mod. It fixes a lot of balance issues (try using blitzkrieg tactics with cavalry and see how far you get), pretties up a lot of stuff and does away with the 3 original Roman factions by combining them into one single faction.
I haven't played through it far enough to find out what happens after the Marian Reforms without two opposing factions to have a civil war with, although Rome itself is still controlled by the SPQR faction as opposed to being a playable faction, and they get an insanely huge army of their own. If the early game is anything to go by though, it's going to be enough of a challenge just getting the 155 required territories for the win, never mind the civil war!
That said, the war between the various Roman factions in the "vanilla" version of the game is about as historically accurate as the cyborg-Hitler boss at the end of Wolfenstein 3D. There was a war (the Social War, 91-88BC) between Rome and the Italian cities who had generally been allied to Rome, but it wasn't the epic "No sir, Fuck
You!"-fest that the second part of RTW descnded into.
OT: A TW game that covered the period from say, the post-Napoleonic era to the present day could be insanely good if it was executed properly. The progression from Militia and Hastati through to Praetorian Cohorts and Onangers would pale into insignificance when compared to the transition from Dragoons and Musket armed infantry through to air power, mobile armour and nuclear arms races. I would spend whatever I had to to upgrade my PC to play that.