RAMBO22 said:
Yeah, just like it's irrelevant that today the "Western" culture we embrace is based off of classical Greece and Rome (sarcasm)...
Bruin said:
Latin is a dead language in the sense that no major populace speaks it.
However, if people spoke it, it wouldn't be a dead language.
Because people would be speaking it.
Do you see how this works?
Much of the grammar is the same, many of the words are cognates, and Latin is something people in many countries study. Countries outside of where Latin originated. It's used for so many things these days we all practically know Latin in some form or another.
Therefore, it's not irrelevant.
English is a mix of Norman French and Old English, which is itself derived from Germanic. So since both German and English are derived from some ancient Germanic should we start speaking it too???
Mandarin isn't derived from Latin
Neither is Russian or anything Germanic.
Only Spanish, Italian, French, Romanian and a few others.
Besides, you're talking about destroying people's cultures. Because that's what it is. Culture is heavily dependant on Language, if you started Latin immersion schools across the globe, you're basically going to destroy everyone's culture in two generation.
No one is going to stand for that.
And why should Asian people learn Latin? Why should Russian? Their language has nothing in common with Latin.
If there is one world language, the move towards that language will be both natural and gradual. Not the resurrection of a dead language that has no contemporary relevance.