CriticKitten said:
LOLWHUT!?!? No they cannot because they wouldnt know and would have no justification for even trying to find out. No they cannot because if I wanted to buy up dozens of copies of a game, the publisher cannot use that to seize those games from me should I decide to save one to play the game and No, because once a disc is finalized you cannot write more data to the disc.
Ok first off your Capped ESPECIALLY needs to be modified to the phrase ONLY IF. Secondly.. your basing your statements on very specific instances that are at least not yet (thank god) all encompassing. Your also mistaking my words and implying Im referring things that Im not.
Next, its only in digital distribution and instances of unneeded DRM scams that you have this sort of contract your referring to and this is all the more reason why connecting games to internet connectivity has hurt everyone involved. In that respect the plug needs to be pulled.
You may choose to think its absurd to get up in arms over digital distribution, but Im actually not against digital distribution. I am against using digital distribution as a way to bypass the same laws that govern and protect lawful purchases and ownership rights. I think its absurd to watch people meander and wallow in complacency and NOT get up in arms about it because it creates a dangerous precedent that is already starting to undermine the development and growth of not only this industry but also the entire economic structure.
Do I think steam is particularly evil? Absolutely not. Do I think that Steam has and IS creating an extremely dangerous precedent that an extremely ignorant and shortsighted generation of consumers is proliferating, you better believe it.
So this makes the 3rd different way Ive said this, So Im beyond my point of redundancy. Ive said my peace and Ill repeat it once more. I hope the current leaders in Digital distribution destroy themselves so that a better form that offers the proper level of ownership rights can rise from its flawed ashes.