I'm actually hoping for this too, seriously why doesn't it have the same customization from the 2nd game? To me that is the boss, not the character I created in 3. I want my purple trench coat, sombrero wearing, hispanic badass back.DVS BSTrD said:I'm hoping they'll release more customization options (including a male Hispanic accent) as DLC. Are you a PC only gamer root?The_root_of_all_evil said:It's a race...SR3 slipped on the customisation and advertising, but have a more solid product.
GTA is re-treading old ground, but looks nicer. Rockstar and Volition have a habit of screwing the PC for the consoles though...
You know those features you really liked? Well, Volition listened...And removed them!Rednog said:I'm actually hoping for this too, seriously why doesn't it have the same customization from the 2nd game? To me that is the boss, not the character I created in 3. I want my purple trench coat, sombrero wearing, hispanic badass back.
I disagree with your assessment. This is 16 hours of them playing primarily the story and estimating 20 hours for 100% completion. The reviewer was only guessing when they said 20 hours to 100% it, and that seems like a really off estimate. You could make the same assessment for SR2 and remember what else the review said - none of the missions were filler or fetch-quests.Therumancer said:Honestly the first official pre-release reviews, and unofficial leaks are kind of convincing me that THQ has lost it's way with "Saint's Row 3", because at the last minute I'm hearing a LOT more that I don't like than I like. I'm not to the point of cancelling my pre-order, but when I'm hearing it takes 16 hours tops to finish, and roughly 20 hours to get 100% if your so inclined... well that's bad, and when you consider the lower level of customization and things like that it's beginning to seem like a disappointment waiting to happen.
THANK YOU, I just played through Gun for the lols right after finishing RDR and I was like "Yep, it is 100% right, Gun was a better game than RDR and that came out in 2005 for Christ's sake." RDR is the most blatant rip off Gun in history, all they need to do is touch up the graphics a bit and add one more Hub town and you've got a completely better game right there. Oh and turn down the BS on Insane, lol. and if they could somehow blend Call of Juarez 2's aim system for when you chrouch behind stuff when aiming that'd be amazing.InfectedStar said:I'm going with SR3, It generally has been more fun over the years then the GTA series had been. They DID nerf the customization for SR3 but if THAT was part of the fight between the two, SR3 would take gold anyways. It's most likely because Rockstar's last good GTA was San Andreas (probably spelt wrong) and they over work their employees SO goddamn much; besides, Red Dead Redemption was ok (but not great, just original... Well, sorta. *cough* *cough* Gun! *cough* *cough*), and L.A. NOIRE was a freakin' bust. Above all else you got way more humor from SR3 and alot more freedom (plus the easter eggs).
and what alludes you to the idea that V won't be like IV and will be like the old games? Cos I hope its worse than IV, everyone buys it, says it sucks, then they wait till the next console gen comes out and make Vice City 2.0 and make it more like the old games.Adam Jensen said:Sure, GTA IV wasn't as fun, but damn I have so many fond memories of GTA 3, VC, SA, LCS and VCS. I could never find a single bad thing about any of those games. I love them to death