I second this. It's too subjective to be a simple choice.DannyJBeckett said:I'm afraid I can't choose between the two. The debate between first and third person is like the debate between most gaming types. It's an entirely subjective thing. I know that that's the point of a poll; to gather peoples opinions and see how many sway to which side, but I think it's a little more complicated than a simple one or the other.
Immersion obviously varies from person-to-person so it's rather subjective. I found the opening half hour of Bioshock to be extremely immersive, although I'm not that huge a fan of the game because the story is kind of a mess IMO. I feel the 1st-person perspective in Mirror's Edge really made the platforming seem to be at a faster pace and more frenzied than a 3rd-person platformer. Jumping across buildings in 1st-person definitely gives you a different feeling than jumping across buildings in 3rd-person.Zachary Amaranth said:How? How exactly are those two games more immersive because of FPP? No offense, but I've heard the generic platitudes, but I'm yet to hear any specific and concrete way in which they were benefited by the perspective.Phoenixmgs said:1st-person can be more immersive as Bioshock was definitely helped by it's 1st-person perspective and I thought Mirror's Edge worked wonderfully as well, I really didn't think 1st-person platforming would work but I loved it.