God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
Boom! Suck on that astrologists! If Shepard says Pluto's a planet, then by god it is a planet.2fish said:Damn too late to be the smart one in this thread... oh well I shall take another role then.
Also Pluto is a planet because Mass Effect says so.
Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?Booze Zombie said:God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
10 + (10 x 0), not 10 (10+0).Maraveno said:Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAMESnowy Rainbow said:I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
as 10+10 x 0
10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20
This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things
Also Solve media : Morbid obesity
That thing is fun
2+5*2-3*6/6Maraveno said:Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAMESnowy Rainbow said:I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
as 10+10 x 0
10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20
This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things
Also Solve media : Morbid obesity
That thing is fun
That's still smarter than an average bear.Snowy Rainbow said:Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?
Wrong.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
Touche, good sir. Touche indeed.Booze Zombie said:That's still smarter than an average bear.Snowy Rainbow said:Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?
Multiplication and division is always done before addition and subtraction.Maraveno said:Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAMESnowy Rainbow said:I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.faceless chick said:i can't believe this thread is still going.
seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
![]()
10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.
Right?
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
as 10+10 x 0
10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20
This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things
Also Solve media : Morbid obesity
That thing is fun
Quite so. Wikipedia's order of operations page states "in mathematics...multiplication is done before addition; in the expression 2 + 3 × 4, the answer is 14." Order of operations always applies, and the correct answer is 10.DracoSuave said:Wrong.Maraveno said:Nope you're dead wrongSnowy Rainbow said:Snip.
That rule only applies to unspecified numbers
10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
Order of Operations always applies. Always. Every single time. The presence or absence of variables doesn't matter. Order of Operations always applies every single time.
dude, do you honestly believe NASA named the moon? people have been calling it "the moon" for hundreds of years. NASA just agrees with the nameSnowy Rainbow said:...Vykrel said:NASA didnt name the moon, smart guy.Snowy Rainbow said:You don't care what the leading professionals in the world have named something? Fair enough.
*cough*
You serious or just joking?
I mean... so Earth isn't Earth because we didn't make it? XD
My point exactly, my good fellow!Snowy Rainbow said:Luna isn't the Moon's name, though. The Moon is.DSK- said:This, plus the fact that every other planet's moon is referenced by a name such as Phobos, Deimos, IO, Ganymede etc, but the moon is almost always just called 'the Moon'.The-Bad-Blooded said:Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun
they already have names
/entire thread
As The-Bad-Blooded mentioned, it does have a name but it simply isn't used all that much.
There's a lot more evidence supporting the great impact theory than any other hypothesis it's like saying *cough* theoretically whenever gravity is mentioned.crudus said:Just because it is the only theory doesn't mean it is true. Just because the theory explains said phenomenon the best, doesn't mean it is true. We can't really conclusively prove that is what happened. Sure there is a nice large amount of evidence that supports the theory, and we are 99% sure that is what happened. However, unless we can get a time machine and watch it happen, it will remain a theory.ThisIsSnake said:Is there a better theory? Only other theories I've heard are creationist ones.
Thanks for proving my point.ctuncks said:Well Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. Can't believe I leaned that from Doom, wayback when.
....You can't be seriously using that as an argument.
You probably don't care or already know, but that's also the root of lunacy - they thought full moons drove people mad, you could use it as a mitigating circumstance in a crime way back whenZakarath said:herp derp, just realized the root word of "lunar" even though I've known it was named Luna.
Yeah I know I'm just saying that when talking about the moon you're talking about our moon, and you'd usually put the planets name before saying that moon I.E. "Jupiter's moon" and most moons in our solar system have actual namesStBishop said:Moons.sylekage said:I'd still call it the moon because I'd know exactly what you're talking about. When we're talking about other planets moons, we always say that name, then moon, like "Jupiter's moon".
So, Moon.
Moons of Jupiter.