Poll: Should the moon have a name?

Recommended Videos

Olorune

New member
Jan 16, 2009
320
0
0
2fish said:
Damn too late to be the smart one in this thread... oh well I shall take another role then.

Also Pluto is a planet because Mass Effect says so.
Boom! Suck on that astrologists! If Shepard says Pluto's a planet, then by god it is a planet.
 

TheAmokz

New member
Apr 10, 2011
285
0
0
Trivia: In Finnish language, moon translates as kuu and Kuu was a moon goddess in Finnish mythology.
 

Snowy Rainbow

New member
Jun 13, 2011
676
0
0
Booze Zombie said:
The-Bad-Blooded said:
Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun

they already have names
/entire thread
God damn it, sir; I wanted to appear smarter than the average bear!
Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?

Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
faceless chick said:
i can't believe this thread is still going.

seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.

10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.

Right?
Nope you're dead wrong

That rule only applies to unspecified numbers

10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.

[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAME
as 10+10 x 0

10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20

This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things

Also Solve media : Morbid obesity

That thing is fun
10 + (10 x 0), not 10 (10+0).

10 + 10 x 0
= 10 + (10 x 0)
= 10 + 0
= 10

I'ma go with Google. It's smarter than me and it says 10!
 

TheAmokz

New member
Apr 10, 2011
285
0
0
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
faceless chick said:
i can't believe this thread is still going.

seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.

10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.

Right?
Nope you're dead wrong

That rule only applies to unspecified numbers

10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.

[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAME
as 10+10 x 0

10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20

This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things

Also Solve media : Morbid obesity

That thing is fun
2+5*2-3*6/6
reduces to 2 +10-18/6=2+10-3=12-3=9
thus 10+10x0=10+0=10

Nuff said.
 

Booze Zombie

New member
Dec 8, 2007
7,416
0
0
Snowy Rainbow said:
Even though they were proven wrong when presented with evidence from NASA and the IAU that our moon is called... Moon not Luna?
That's still smarter than an average bear.
 

DracoSuave

New member
Jan 26, 2009
1,685
0
0
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
faceless chick said:
i can't believe this thread is still going.

seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.

10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.

Right?
Nope you're dead wrong

That rule only applies to unspecified numbers

10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
Wrong.

Order of Operations always applies. Always. Every single time. The presence or absence of variables doesn't matter. Order of Operations always applies every single time.
 

MarxII

New member
Feb 19, 2011
24
0
0
I think Luna is a lovely name, so I propose no change to that.

I do maintain that the moon should have a theme song. I nominate Duran Duran.
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
faceless chick said:
i can't believe this thread is still going.

seriously people..you're almost as bad as these guys:
I thought the answer was 10. Order of operations and all.

10 + 10 x 0 = 10 + (10 x 0) = 10.

Right?
Nope you're dead wrong

That rule only applies to unspecified numbers

10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
I dunno... Google says I be right. And I like Google.

[link]http://www.google.com/search?q=10+%2B+10+x+0&btnG=Google+Search[/link]
Ehm I'm telling you 10(10+0) IS NOT THE SAME
as 10+10 x 0

10(10+0)
would be
10 x 10 + 0
20+0 = 20

This is just ridiculous trolling now
Adding 0 or Multiplying by 0 are to different things

Also Solve media : Morbid obesity

That thing is fun
Multiplication and division is always done before addition and subtraction.

PEMDAS
Patenthesis
Exponents
Multiplications
Division
Addition
Subtraction

Therefore, 10 + 10 x 0 would go like this:

10 + 10 x 0

10 + 0

10

The answer is 10.

End of story.

Order of Operations:

http://www.mathgoodies.com/lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
 

MetroidNut

New member
Sep 2, 2009
969
0
0
DracoSuave said:
Maraveno said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
Nope you're dead wrong

That rule only applies to unspecified numbers

10+10 x 0 = ?
10+10 =20
20 x 0 = 0
if anything you could write it as
(10+10)0=
Wrong.

Order of Operations always applies. Always. Every single time. The presence or absence of variables doesn't matter. Order of Operations always applies every single time.
Quite so. Wikipedia's order of operations page states "in mathematics...multiplication is done before addition; in the expression 2 + 3 × 4, the answer is 14." Order of operations always applies, and the correct answer is 10.
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,361
3
43
I didn't know that "Luna" was such a well known fact. Thank Mass Effect and its mission that lets me pick a specialization for that tidbit (at least for me).

But a good alternate name is "The Big Glowing Night Shiny"
 

Vykrel

New member
Feb 26, 2009
1,317
0
0
Snowy Rainbow said:
Vykrel said:
Snowy Rainbow said:
You don't care what the leading professionals in the world have named something? Fair enough.

*cough*
NASA didnt name the moon, smart guy.
...

You serious or just joking?

I mean... so Earth isn't Earth because we didn't make it? XD
dude, do you honestly believe NASA named the moon? people have been calling it "the moon" for hundreds of years. NASA just agrees with the name

and that last sentence doesnt make any sense so i cant comment on it.
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
Snowy Rainbow said:
DSK- said:
The-Bad-Blooded said:
Luna = Moon
Sol = Sun

they already have names
/entire thread
This, plus the fact that every other planet's moon is referenced by a name such as Phobos, Deimos, IO, Ganymede etc, but the moon is almost always just called 'the Moon'.

As The-Bad-Blooded mentioned, it does have a name but it simply isn't used all that much.
Luna isn't the Moon's name, though. The Moon is.
My point exactly, my good fellow!
 

ThisIsSnake

New member
Mar 3, 2011
551
0
0
crudus said:
ThisIsSnake said:
Is there a better theory? Only other theories I've heard are creationist ones.
Just because it is the only theory doesn't mean it is true. Just because the theory explains said phenomenon the best, doesn't mean it is true. We can't really conclusively prove that is what happened. Sure there is a nice large amount of evidence that supports the theory, and we are 99% sure that is what happened. However, unless we can get a time machine and watch it happen, it will remain a theory.

ctuncks said:
Well Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos. Can't believe I leaned that from Doom, wayback when.
Thanks for proving my point.

....You can't be seriously using that as an argument.
There's a lot more evidence supporting the great impact theory than any other hypothesis it's like saying *cough* theoretically whenever gravity is mentioned.

Mars doesn't have two moons, it has two natural satellites. Calling them moons isn't scientific.
 

The_Decoy

New member
Nov 22, 2009
279
0
0
Zakarath said:
herp derp, just realized the root word of "lunar" even though I've known it was named Luna.
You probably don't care or already know, but that's also the root of lunacy - they thought full moons drove people mad, you could use it as a mitigating circumstance in a crime way back when :)

And Luna isn't the name of the moon, it's the *latin* name of the moon. Woo, facts.
 

sylekage

New member
Dec 24, 2008
710
0
0
StBishop said:
sylekage said:
I'd still call it the moon because I'd know exactly what you're talking about. When we're talking about other planets moons, we always say that name, then moon, like "Jupiter's moon".

So, Moon.
Moons.

Moons of Jupiter.
Yeah I know I'm just saying that when talking about the moon you're talking about our moon, and you'd usually put the planets name before saying that moon I.E. "Jupiter's moon" and most moons in our solar system have actual names