Oh really?Talvrae said:A bunch of kid craving for attention? I respected theyr attacks on the Church of Scientology. But otherwise they pick theyr fights poorly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIfKLp-VIQ0
Oh really?Talvrae said:A bunch of kid craving for attention? I respected theyr attacks on the Church of Scientology. But otherwise they pick theyr fights poorly
Ok ok I see what you're saying, do they have any people that like lead them? like is there some kind of general consensus that goes around before they decide if they want to act?opuri said:I wouldn't call it experience, but yeah you could say i sort of know how they work. And it's difficult to explain because there's no defined structure. You can't organize anonymous because there's no criteria to use.creager91 said:You seem to have quite a bit of experience with them. Do you know if they have like any actual structure or ANY form of organization at all?opuri said:Why would they bother you? People here seem to treat Anonymous as a defined group, whereas they're just a bunch of individuals that randomly scatter and group if their interests dictate so.Broady Brio said:I stand out of their way.
I don't bother them. They don't bother me.
I guess that for a reference one could resort to a mix of "V for Vendetta" and "Fight Club"
Now i'm talking a bit on what i've seen and not what i've done, but Anonymous does not have any leaders. We've had a few several persistant Anons that have pretty much been anywhere, but nothing else than that.creager91 said:Ok ok I see what you're saying, do they have any people that like lead them? like is there some kind of general consensus that goes around before they decide if they want to act?opuri said:I wouldn't call it experience, but yeah you could say i sort of know how they work. And it's difficult to explain because there's no defined structure. You can't organize anonymous because there's no criteria to use.creager91 said:You seem to have quite a bit of experience with them. Do you know if they have like any actual structure or ANY form of organization at all?opuri said:Why would they bother you? People here seem to treat Anonymous as a defined group, whereas they're just a bunch of individuals that randomly scatter and group if their interests dictate so.Broady Brio said:I stand out of their way.
I don't bother them. They don't bother me.
I guess that for a reference one could resort to a mix of "V for Vendetta" and "Fight Club"
Enlighten us?Jordan_17 said:It is quite clear that no one in this thread knows who Anonymous really are.
Haha gotta admit that kind of made me laugh, I find that to be especially true on XBL thocanadamus_prime said:Pretty much this:
![]()
This is what i was trying to explain. So yeah, +1.8bitlove2a03 said:Near as I can tell, 99% of Anons are moronic 4channers or script kiddies. They're the types of people who could drop off the face of the earth and no one would really pay that much mind. The 1% that actually have real know-how and are evidently fighting for something I can only judge by their actions, which thus far have actually been good deeds.
Because it is not an entity.Simalacrum said:Well its kinda impossible to agree/disagree with absolutely everything about Anonymous - it has no organisational structure; it has no official policies or actions; pretty much anyone can call themselves Anonymous.
Thing is, there's a hell of a lot of different aspects that call themselves Anonymous that isn't 4chan - For example, whyweprotest.net is a anti-scientology website, which, naturally, is aligned with Anonymous.
Point is, one can't really 'agree' or 'disagree' with the entity as a whole.
They aren't elite hackers, nor do they think they are. They sit looking at funny pictures on the internet and occasionally they decide they don't like something.opuri said:Enlighten us?Jordan_17 said:It is quite clear that no one in this thread knows who Anonymous really are.
Who said they are? And anyways, some of them actually are. You'd be suprised of what one can find amongst anonymous.Jordan_17 said:They aren't elite hackers, nor do they think they are. They sit looking at funny pictures on the internet and occasionally they decide they don't like something.opuri said:Enlighten us?Jordan_17 said:It is quite clear that no one in this thread knows who Anonymous really are.
A bit different... westboroo churchfaked to have been tretened by annonymous to pick a fight against them and gather attention... hey almost begued to be attacked by Annonymous. But i sure dont support theyr atack to protect WikiLeaks...opuri said:Oh really?Talvrae said:A bunch of kid craving for attention? I respected theyr attacks on the Church of Scientology. But otherwise they pick theyr fights poorly
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIfKLp-VIQ0