That's exactly why it would be a bad thing. Having a single console future may be quite a good idea since we wouldn't have to worry about compatibility issues or exclusives, but I don't want Microsoft to be in charge of that single console. They would use it to create a monopoly and hike up prices and generally make it a pain in the arse to use the machine. They're already really draconian over 3rd party hardware so they can charge really high prices for their own. And they have a similar attitude when it comes to multi-platform games too. Imagine how bad they would be if they controlled the whole console market! Not good! At this point at least, competition is good for the consumer.jboking said:Essentially, without competition, Microsoft would be able to do whatever they want.
I agree but you did leave out Xenoblade Chronicles one of the most impressive and enjoyable games this generation (or any generation) there is also the last story coming out soon so hopefully that will be good as well and dont forget mario galaxy a rare game that has appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers.Eventidal said:Sir, I am deeply offended.
Nintendo has as much hardcore as MS and Sony do, or even more. Look at Monster Hunter Tri. Look at Sin and Punishment or Kid Icarus: Uprising.*snip*
Conza said:Third huh? PS1+PS2+PS3=319 million sales (or near abouts), but let's be fair, and remove the PS1, since Microsoft wasn't in the market then, to give us 216 million sales.
Stack that against Xbox+X360= 90 million sales, I don't see Sony below Microsoft on that count.
Nintendo? 33+22+95=150 million (64+GC+Wii), or 117 million the last 2 generations, Playstation's 319 million beat it more than two to one, its 216 million is nearly double as well... did you research this based on the current console generation only?
Ah yes, your link says "If you want lifetime numbers, Nintendo still wins, with 95 million Wiis sold, beating 66 million Xbox 360s and 62 million PS3s" - The title is a bit of a grab, it's not genuinely true, its a snippet of truth, over a very small period of time, then taken out of context to imply something, which is not the case.
Sony proves competition doesn't inspire greatness. what do they do to compete better? reduce losses like the psp e1000. how can you even respect a company that sells you a product with removed functions for the price of what america is already paying for the 3k?RatRace123 said:Bad. I don't have anything against Microsoft, but we need the diversity out there. Competition inspires greatness, after all.
MS doesn't get a cent from PC users besides the cost of Windows (which I already have) and standard publisher's rates (and considering they've published next to nothing for years...)J3bba said:Problem with running to your PC is that chances are you'll be using windows for gaming and funding Microsoft anywayomicron1 said:I would recuse myself to the PC completely.
Microsoft has earned my eternal enmity. Frankly, I don't see this vanishing any time soon. Plus, I know that if they have the "hardcore" console market almost entirely to themselves, they'll rapidly become even more intolerable towards their PC audience. Not something to look forward to, gentlemen. Not at all.![]()
If your crowd is the FPS and TPS then yes, Nintendo isn't for your.MetallicaRulez0 said:What's the joke? Nintendo has been doing casual games and 2-3 first party titles every year since the Wii launched. The last hardcore game they released was BRAWL, and that was what, 2008?Stagnant said:...You're joking, right? Right?jboking said:Concerning that we all known Nintendo is in a secluded little league of their own, that leaves Microsoft to handle the hardcore video game market next generation.
I respect Nintendo as a company, but let's please not pretend that Nintendo makes games for "our" crowd, ie: hardcore gamers.