Poll: Sony Pulls Out of the Console Race

Recommended Videos

Scrustle

New member
Apr 30, 2011
2,031
0
0
jboking said:
Essentially, without competition, Microsoft would be able to do whatever they want.
That's exactly why it would be a bad thing. Having a single console future may be quite a good idea since we wouldn't have to worry about compatibility issues or exclusives, but I don't want Microsoft to be in charge of that single console. They would use it to create a monopoly and hike up prices and generally make it a pain in the arse to use the machine. They're already really draconian over 3rd party hardware so they can charge really high prices for their own. And they have a similar attitude when it comes to multi-platform games too. Imagine how bad they would be if they controlled the whole console market! Not good! At this point at least, competition is good for the consumer.

And to be honest, with these rumours of the next Xbox being Kinect focused and blocking used games, a PS4 was starting to look pretty appealing.
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,485
0
0
Okay, on the first point, enough with the panic button. There's three major console companies and one of them's got to be in third. They're also so ginormous that it would probably take YEARS or one very quick war to actually destroy one. It's gotten to that point.

Second point, Miciosoft as the sole console on the market would be painful. Why? Well, for starters, RROD. There's a Yellow Light Of Doom for PS3s, but unless I'm going to the wrong site...they don't happen as often. Poor X-Box fans have to deal with RROD in waves sometimes, a generation of machine deaths. Now, this technology is amazing, but it's really the "America! Fuck yeah!" of the other console giant. It's a nice system, but Microsoft didn't exactly pioneer this stuff. And let's not forget that, well, this IS Microsoft...and there are enough complaints about Microsoft to fill uhhh...Jupiter, seriously. Okay, everybody complains about EVERYTHING, really, but the butt of the joke is seen more against what many call the Evil Empire. Sorry, Bill. Branded for life.
 

dimensional

New member
Jun 13, 2011
1,272
0
0
Eventidal said:
Sir, I am deeply offended.

Nintendo has as much hardcore as MS and Sony do, or even more. Look at Monster Hunter Tri. Look at Sin and Punishment or Kid Icarus: Uprising.*snip*
I agree but you did leave out Xenoblade Chronicles one of the most impressive and enjoyable games this generation (or any generation) there is also the last story coming out soon so hopefully that will be good as well and dont forget mario galaxy a rare game that has appeal to both hardcore and casual gamers.

Trouble with Nintendo wii is that there are a lot more casual games on the system so the `proper` games tend to get lost and bypass most peoples attention and now they seem to have dug themselves into a hole by trying to appeal to the casual crowd only to realise casual gamers dont really buy that many games and arent a sustainable primary market.

Anyway if for some reason Microsoft did become the only `hardcore` console on the market I would stop gaming as it would be a very bad situation for the market there needs to be competition and Microsoft can not be trusted to not screw over everybody as much as possible if they had a monopoly on the console market (or near to). Actually I wouldnt trust any company with a monopoly not to try and milk people as much as possible but out of the three console manufacturers microsofts dominance would be worst case scenario.
 

Joshimodo

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,956
0
0
Conza said:
Third huh? PS1+PS2+PS3=319 million sales (or near abouts), but let's be fair, and remove the PS1, since Microsoft wasn't in the market then, to give us 216 million sales.

Stack that against Xbox+X360= 90 million sales, I don't see Sony below Microsoft on that count.

Nintendo? 33+22+95=150 million (64+GC+Wii), or 117 million the last 2 generations, Playstation's 319 million beat it more than two to one, its 216 million is nearly double as well... did you research this based on the current console generation only?

Ah yes, your link says "If you want lifetime numbers, Nintendo still wins, with 95 million Wiis sold, beating 66 million Xbox 360s and 62 million PS3s" - The title is a bit of a grab, it's not genuinely true, its a snippet of truth, over a very small period of time, then taken out of context to imply something, which is not the case.

That's not including Nintendo's utter reign over the handheld market, including the past few generations. Or the NES/SNES popularity. Numbers account for little. Nintendo would also be the least likely to be "corrupted" by industry power. They're a gaming company through-and-through. Just not "hardcore" in the past few years. Sony, much like MS, is something else before being a gaming company, and is therefore open to being controlled from that aspect.
 

Martijn Nijkeuter

New member
Oct 20, 2011
35
0
0
RatRace123 said:
Bad. I don't have anything against Microsoft, but we need the diversity out there. Competition inspires greatness, after all.
Sony proves competition doesn't inspire greatness. what do they do to compete better? reduce losses like the psp e1000. how can you even respect a company that sells you a product with removed functions for the price of what america is already paying for the 3k?

As far as horrible decisions and customer awareness go, Sony wins without a doubt.
(granted Nintendo screwed up with the lack of proper titles on the wii, but they seem to have realized it and admitted it..)
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
J3bba said:
omicron1 said:
I would recuse myself to the PC completely.

Microsoft has earned my eternal enmity. Frankly, I don't see this vanishing any time soon. Plus, I know that if they have the "hardcore" console market almost entirely to themselves, they'll rapidly become even more intolerable towards their PC audience. Not something to look forward to, gentlemen. Not at all.
Problem with running to your PC is that chances are you'll be using windows for gaming and funding Microsoft anyway :p
MS doesn't get a cent from PC users besides the cost of Windows (which I already have) and standard publisher's rates (and considering they've published next to nothing for years...)
This, of course, is why they'd rather I abandon my PC in favor of paying them for the console, the 2-300% value markup on accessories, the ridiculous Live fees (Valve provides the same thing for free, you bastards), and their $8 per-game graft. Simply put, a console user pays them more money - which is why they stopped supporting the PC years ago - which (along with their occasional lying pledges of support) is why I hate them so.
 

OldNewNewOld

New member
Mar 2, 2011
1,494
0
0
MetallicaRulez0 said:
Stagnant said:
jboking said:
Concerning that we all known Nintendo is in a secluded little league of their own, that leaves Microsoft to handle the hardcore video game market next generation.
...You're joking, right? Right?
What's the joke? Nintendo has been doing casual games and 2-3 first party titles every year since the Wii launched. The last hardcore game they released was BRAWL, and that was what, 2008?

I respect Nintendo as a company, but let's please not pretend that Nintendo makes games for "our" crowd, ie: hardcore gamers.
If your crowd is the FPS and TPS then yes, Nintendo isn't for your.
Last time I checked, Xenoblade Chronicle is a hardcore game, jet it came out just recently. This month we in Europe get The Last Story. Zelda came out in November last year... (just a few recent and there are many more).

Just because Nintendo doesn't have the gray/brown F/TPS doesn't mean they don't have hardcore games. Nintendo has more Wii exclusives worth mentioning than the Xbox 360 and PS3 together.
 

Sirron Kcuch

New member
Jan 3, 2012
242
0
0
The new CEO could see a problem with the console war.
I'm an Xbox user, but you know what? We need that competition in order to avoid a monopoly. Otherwise, the next Xbox will be either crap or too expensive.

I would get myself a gaming PC in that case
 

mariofan1000

New member
Sep 25, 2009
242
0
0
I don't think it would be a monopoly. There are still 2 competitors:

A certain way to get games for free illegally
PC Gaming.

If prices skyrocketed, PC Gaming might end up being cheaper.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
I would prefer Sony and MS to work together on a console - one does software and the other designs the hardware. But either way it would be a sad loss if Sony left, i remember my first PS1 and PS2 with fond memories.
 

yankeefan19

New member
Mar 20, 2009
663
0
0
I would only like it because I would only have to buy one console to get the former playstation exclusives that I've always wanted but didn't think they were worth buying a new console for.
 

loa

New member
Jan 28, 2012
1,716
0
0
Maybe your apocalyptic scenario would carry more weight if you explained what "hardcore" means?
 

gigastrike

New member
Jul 13, 2008
3,112
0
0
I'm pretty sure that Nintendo is making a point to appeal to the "hardcore" market in the next generation anyway.
 

y8c616

New member
May 14, 2008
305
0
0
The market needs diversity to be healthy, and I've always been a PS guy anyway so this would be bad. Also if you work out average sales per year PS3 outsells the 360 anyway (as its been out a year less and only sold 3 million less units)
 

JasonKaotic

New member
Mar 18, 2009
1,444
0
0
The only reason the PS3 isn't doing so well is because it had a rough introduction to the current generation. Because of it the Xbox 360 got a head start, and by the time the PS3 had a steady release most people had already bought an Xbox and didn't want to buy both consoles, and more people bought a 360 because it had a much bigger community than the PS3. It has to be said, at least to me the PS3 is better in every way except community.
Next generation I can't tell what will happen. Either the fanboys will wait for their console to come out and buy that, or if the PS4 and next Xbox have a closer release date the PS4 might have a much fairer chance. We'll see.
But I doubt the rumours are true. If Sony can ignore the awful sales of the Vita, I'm pretty sure they won't be bothered enough by the PS3's position to scrap the PS4.
And we can all pretty much ignore the Wii-U. Unless they go back to their old ways I doubt Nintendo will be in the war much longer.
 

soes757

New member
Jan 24, 2011
204
0
0
As long a Sony is moving units and making money there's no way they're dropping the console market.
 

NightHawk21

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,272
0
0
It would be awful. Say what you will about either console, but competition is good for the industry, and since Nintendo doesn't really have the main AAA titles on its console its not really a competitor in most people's eyes as in a lot of cases the demographics are different.

Also the numbers that put the 360 in the lead are rather abysmal, less than a million and around 4 million. I would personally like to see the same statistic but with only first time buyers since with the 360's well known hardware issues at launch and many people buying multiple consoles because of those or to upgrade, I feel the numbers are even closer if not putting Sony in the lead. Also it is worth pointing out that Sony said they aren't releasing the next console this year, but they already highered designers for it.
 

Agow95

New member
Jul 29, 2011
444
0
0
I'm not a sony fan, but microsoft are asses with some things, overall, I would say it would be alright, at least xbox has better live service, and doesn't get hacked.